On April 17, 2018 a
Answer - DEFENDANT ROSENDIN ELECTRIC, INC.S ANSWER TO COMPLAINT
was filed
involving a dispute between
Lopez Jacob,
Williams Brian,
and
Rosendin Electric Inc.,
for Other Employment Complaint Case (General Jurisdiction)
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
1 RUTAN & TUCKER, LLP
Mark J. Payne (State Bar No. 157989) Sup I A?j.LE
2 mpayne@rutan.com County Ca llfe,,kornia
of ioc Anoel
611 Anton Boulevard, Suite 1400
3 Costa Mesa, California 92626-1931 JUL 2 a 2010
Telephone: 714-641-5100 $4erri
4 Facsimile: 714-546-9035 aneir,cun ve
Vlerk of Court
5 Attorneys for Defendant , Deputy
ROSENDIN ELECTRIC, INC.
6
7
8 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
9 FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, SPRING STREET COURTHOUSE
10
11 JACOB LOPEZ, individually, and on behalf of Case No. BC702388
other members of the general public similarly
12 situated, ASSIGNED FOR ALL PURPOSES To
HON. MAREN NELSON, DEPT. SS 17
13 Plaintiff,
DEFENDANT ROSENDIN ELECTRIC,
14 vs. INC.'S ANSWER TO COMPLAINT
15 ROSENDIN ELECTRIC, INC., a California Date Action Filed: April 17, 2018
corporation; and DOES I through 100, Trial Date: Not Scheduled
16 inclusive,
17 Defendants.
18
19 Defendant Rosendin Electric, Inc. for itself alone, answers the unverified Complaint in this
20 action as follows:
21 GENERAL DENIAL
22 Pursuant to the provisions of Code of Civil Procedure section 431.30, Rosendin Electric
23 denies, generally and specifically, each and every allegation contained in the Complaint, and the
24 whole thereof, and specifically denies that Plaintiff Jacob Lopez, or any other similarly situated
25 persons, have been damaged in the manner or sums alleged, or in any manner or sum at all, or is
26 entitled to the relief requested, or any relief whatsoever, from or against Defendant.
27 AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES
28 As and for its separate and independent affirmative defenses in this action, and without
_ Rutan & Tucker, LLP
attorneys at law -1-
12 6
211/022879-0106
12 637868.1 a07/26/18
a07/2
/26/18 DEFENDANT ROSENDIN ELECTRIC, INC.'S ANSWER TO COMPLAINT
Document Filed Date
July 26, 2018
Case Filing Date
April 17, 2018
Category
Other Employment Complaint Case (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
1 RUTAN & TUCKER, LLP Mark J. Payne (State Bar No. 157989) Sup I A?j.LE 2 mpayne@rutan.com County Ca llfe,,kornia of ioc Anoel 611 Anton Boulevard, Suite 1400 3 Costa Mesa, California 92626-1931 JUL 2 a 2010 Telephone: 714-641-5100 $4erri 4 Facsimile: 714-546-9035 aneir,cun ve Vlerk of Court 5 Attorneys for Defendant , Deputy ROSENDIN ELECTRIC, INC. 6 7 8 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 9 FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, SPRING STREET COURTHOUSE 10 11 JACOB LOPEZ, individually, and on behalf of Case No. BC702388 other members of the general public similarly 12 situated, ASSIGNED FOR ALL PURPOSES To HON. MAREN NELSON, DEPT. SS 17 13 Plaintiff, DEFENDANT ROSENDIN ELECTRIC, 14 vs. INC.'S ANSWER TO COMPLAINT 15 ROSENDIN ELECTRIC, INC., a California Date Action Filed: April 17, 2018 corporation; and DOES I through 100, Trial Date: Not Scheduled 16 inclusive, 17 Defendants. 18 19 Defendant Rosendin Electric, Inc. for itself alone, answers the unverified Complaint in this 20 action as follows: 21 GENERAL DENIAL 22 Pursuant to the provisions of Code of Civil Procedure section 431.30, Rosendin Electric 23 denies, generally and specifically, each and every allegation contained in the Complaint, and the 24 whole thereof, and specifically denies that Plaintiff Jacob Lopez, or any other similarly situated 25 persons, have been damaged in the manner or sums alleged, or in any manner or sum at all, or is 26 entitled to the relief requested, or any relief whatsoever, from or against Defendant. 27 AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES 28 As and for its separate and independent affirmative defenses in this action, and without _ Rutan & Tucker, LLP attorneys at law -1- 12 6 211/022879-0106 12 637868.1 a07/26/18 a07/2 /26/18 DEFENDANT ROSENDIN ELECTRIC, INC.'S ANSWER TO COMPLAINT