arrow left
arrow right
  • JENNIFER SARTORY VS JILL RHONDA PETERSON ET AL Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • JENNIFER SARTORY VS JILL RHONDA PETERSON ET AL Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

l « x . ' 0 W I JlLLlAN PETERSON 2 , P.O. Box 736 g PALM SPRINGS, CA 92263 FILED 3 5l I)emdan/ in Propria PL'I‘.S'())7(l R F‘ 5=p5onré?«(>;rr;Ko:§:au{am ou ; “gees 4t E W‘ OCT 26 2018 5 l ' .. Sheiri E Carter, Executive Ofccr/Clerk I e Indy 7 Q ‘ li\.lOl’ii‘l\,rL/es’!'_ 8 . SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATl7£ OF CALIFORNIA 9 LOS ANGELES - VAN NUYS COURTHOUSE EAST . lo JENNIFER SARTORY, an individual, Case No. LC 106039 I H ; Plaintiff, Complaint Filed: August 7, 2017 12 y A Assigned to: Hon. Huey Cotton. -— Dept. A 2 v. H l I)EF’ENDANT’S NOTICE OF NON-RECEIPT ‘ j J lLLlAN PETERSON, an individual, OF PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS T0 COMPEL I4 j DISCOVERY ,5 I Defendant, Complaint Filed: August 7, 2017 3 Trial Date: August 15,2019 16 § 17 b ._........._._._,.._-_._____._T___ 18 : NOTICE TO THE HONORABLCE COURT: l l‘) E This is to inform the Court that the Defendant, Jillian Peterson has not received any 20 documents to oppose any motions including but not limited to the motions to compel discovery. 21 7 The Dcfentltmt has endlessly told the Court and has submitted several motions telling Judge 22 ' 1 Cotton she has NOT receive any documents from the plaintiff. This has been an ongoing problem 23 , 24 l and yet Judge Cotton has ignored it and let the plaintifftmd her counsel perjure themselves. The 25 plaintiff and her counsel have committed perjury from the beginning and yet Judge Cotton is l 26 7 allowing this in his courtroom. } -1- 27 A DI5l’liNI)ANT'S NOTICE Oi" NON-Rl.5Cli|l"l'0I" l'l../\!N'l'l|"‘l7'S MOTIONS TO COM NIL DISCOVIZRY 28 ; 19:49:23 2018-10~25