arrow left
arrow right
  • JENNIFER SARTORY VS JILL RHONDA PETERSON ET AL Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • JENNIFER SARTORY VS JILL RHONDA PETERSON ET AL Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 06/18/2021 03:09 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by A. Boyadzhyan,Deputy Clerk 1 JILLIAN PETERSON P. O. Box 736 (Mailing) 2 Palm Springs, CA 92263 3 Defendant, in Propria Persona 4 5 6 7 8 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 9 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 10 VAN NUYS COURTHOUSE EAST CIVIL DIVISION UNLIMITED JURISDICTION 11 12 13 JENNIFER SARTORY, No.: BC 708090 14 Plaintiff DEFENDANT'S REQUEST FOR 15 JUDICIAL NOTICE IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT'S JUDGEMENT ON THE 16 v. PLEADINGS 17 JILLIAN PETERSON, [Concurrently filed with Defendant’s Memo- 18 randum of Points and Authorities in Judge- Defendant ment on the Pleadings; and Declaration of 19 Jillian Peterson] 20 Judge: Hon. Huey P. Cotton 21 Department: A Date: Jul 19, 2021 22 Time: 8:30 a.m. 23 RESERVATION ID: 180510313403 24 25 TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD: 26 Jillian Peterson, Defendant (“Peterson” or “Defendant”) requests that the court take 27 judicial notice of the following: 28 1.The Docket in case # 17VERO00648 showing the case was dismissed for lack of prosecution; is hereto attached as Exhibit 1. JUDICIAL NOTICE