arrow left
arrow right
  • VALROIDE LYONS VS METROMILE Petition to Compel/Confirm/Vacate Arbitration (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • VALROIDE LYONS VS METROMILE Petition to Compel/Confirm/Vacate Arbitration (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 05/02/2019 02:13 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by A. Miro,Deputy Clerk CM-110 ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, Slate Bar number, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY Edward E. Dollar, Esq. SBN 153873 HOMAN & STONE 12 N. Fifth Street Redlands, CA 92373 TELEPHONE NO.: ( 909) 307-9380 FAX N0.(0-•I), ( 90 9) 793-0210 E-MAILAoo••ssro•"'""'i' edollar@homan-stone.com ATTORNEYFOR(Name): Resoondent, Metromile SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF Los Angeles STREET ADDRESS: 111 N. Hill Street MAILING ADDRESS: Los Angeles, CA 90012 CITY AND ZIP CODE: BRANCH NAME:Stanley Mosk Division PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Valroide Lyons DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Metromile CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NUMBER: (Check one): IX) UNLIMITED CASE LIMITED CASE D BS173735 (Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25,000 exceeds $25,000) or less) A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows: Date: 5/6/2019 Time: 8:30 Dept.: 17 Div.: Room: Address of court (if different from the address above): W Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name): Edward E. Dollar, Esq. INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided. 1. Party or parties (answer one): a. W This statement is submitted by party (name): Respondent, Metromile b. D This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names): 2. Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. The complaint was filed on (date): b. DThe cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date): 3. Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. D All parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed. b. D The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint (1) D have not been served (specify names and explain why not): (2) D have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names): (3) D have had a default entered against them (specify names): c. D The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and the date by which they may be se,ved): 4. Description of case a. Type of case in W complaint D cross-complaint (Describe, including causes of action): Petition to Compel Arbitation-Underinsured Motorist Claim Page 1 of 5 m· Cal. Rules of Court, CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT C I )!!Fonns· Form AdOPted for Mandatory Use Judicial Council of Califomia Essential rules 3.720-3.730 www.courts.ca.gov CM•110 [Rev. July 1, 2011] ....., National General Insur