arrow left
arrow right
  • JUAREZ ALVAREZ -v- HUNT PRISCILLA LIVING TRUST et al Print Complaint for Damages Unlimited  document preview
  • JUAREZ ALVAREZ -v- HUNT PRISCILLA LIVING TRUST et al Print Complaint for Damages Unlimited  document preview
  • JUAREZ ALVAREZ -v- HUNT PRISCILLA LIVING TRUST et al Print Complaint for Damages Unlimited  document preview
  • JUAREZ ALVAREZ -v- HUNT PRISCILLA LIVING TRUST et al Print Complaint for Damages Unlimited  document preview
						
                                

Preview

t i y 1 SCHIINIANN RC SENBERG I IM SGHCIMANN CSB I a 17Q94 t f a X 2 Sc iccmccn t Sclaurnar n c set er cutn titV r ci rr r E i Ea tC t BRADLEY R IWIATHEWS CS8 Na 202t S5 3 retic l SchurraannRaserber cvm E 1 3100 Bristol Street Suite 1Q0 4 Casta Nfesa CA 92b26 t f Tel 14 8SO 02I 0 Y f r r J J 1 il af ti j 1P t3 X 6 Attorneys for D fenda t HUI tT PRISCILLA LIVIi G TRUST SU RiC R C t URT OF THE ST TE QF GALIFfJR iA 9 Ft R THE C I TI TTY JF SAlY E3ERNARD NO Ip 11 Y LANDA JUAREZ ALVAREZ an Case No CTVDS 19I6334 izldividual 22 Judg Thamas S Gar a F laintiff Dept 5 27 1 I EFENDANT HITNT PRISCILL i LIVING N v 4 TRUST S ANS t ER Tt3 PLAINTIFF S HUNT PRISGILLA LNING TII LTST CITY CUMPLAIl T Q C 15 O ItiITANA and DOES 1 t rrc u h l QQ o z inelusive Date Actic n Filed IYIay 31 2Q19 s 16 Trial l ate Juz e 8 2Q21 ti Q Q s a w w D f 22t 11tS v 7 x M o and i 18 NAN HERNANDEZ an individual 19 Npminal Defezzdaz t 20 22 AND ALL RELATEI ACTIC NS 23 24 25 Defendan LTNT PRISCiLLA LI IN ar TRUST fendant answers the Un erified 26 Cornplaint af Plaintiff OLANDA JUAREZ AL AREZ Piai ntiff fQr itseifalon and for o 27 otlier defendant admits denies and alleges as follows 28 1 INT iNS 4 B BY T1 FEIYDANT HU YT PRISCILLA L14 NC TRUST TtJ PLAfNTITF S C 31 fiPL f 1 GENF1 tAL DENIAL 2 1 Pursuant to the pravisions of ection 431 34 af the Cc de af Civil Procedure this 3 answering Defendant denies generally and specifieaily each and every allegatian contained in 4 Plaintiff s Complaint and the whole thereaf and each and every alleged cause of action therein 5 and denies that Plaintiff sustained damages in the sum or sums alleged or at a11 by reasan of any 6 aet breach or omissian on the part Qf this answering Defendant i 7 FIRST AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE i I ailure ta State A Cause of Action 9 2 As and for a separate distinct affirmati e defense to the Complaint this answering 10 Defendant atle es that Plaintif s Camglaint fails to state facts sufficient to constitut a cause o j11 action against this a nswering Defendant 12 SECQND AFFIRMATIVE DEF ENSE 13 tatutes ofLimitation N o 14 3 As and for a separate distinct affirmative defense to the Camplaint this answering cn c o r 15 Defendant alleges that Plaintiff s Camplaint and a11 causes 4faction and claims asserted therein N LLt 15 are barred by the app2icable Statutes of Limitatian as set out in Code of Civi1 Procedure 335 1 g 17 337 340 342 343 and Government Cade 911 2 945 6 and 950 2 o cvi 18 THIRD AF iRMATIVE DEFENSE 19 tegligence of Decedent 20 4 As a d for a separate distinct affirmative defens to the Complaint this answering 21 Defendant alleges that Plaintiffis barred from any recavery herein on the basis that the negligence 22 caxelessness andlor recklessness of Decedent was the sole and praximate cause of Decedent s 23 injuries and death and Plaintiff s atleged lasses and darrzages but in the event a finding is made 24 that negligence exists on the part ofthis answering De eandant which praximately contributed to 25 Decedent s alleged injuries and death and Plaintif s alleged losses and damages Plaintiff s 26 amount of recovery if any shalZ be reduced pra tanta by the percentage af D cedent s own 27 c mparative negligence carelessness and or fautt 28 iii 2 A1 iSW R BY DE ENiDAi t I IiUNT PRISCILLA L YING TRUST TO PLAINTIFF S COMPLAINT