arrow left
arrow right
  • JUAREZ ALVAREZ -v- HUNT PRISCILLA LIVING TRUST et al Print Complaint for Damages Unlimited  document preview
  • JUAREZ ALVAREZ -v- HUNT PRISCILLA LIVING TRUST et al Print Complaint for Damages Unlimited  document preview
  • JUAREZ ALVAREZ -v- HUNT PRISCILLA LIVING TRUST et al Print Complaint for Damages Unlimited  document preview
  • JUAREZ ALVAREZ -v- HUNT PRISCILLA LIVING TRUST et al Print Complaint for Damages Unlimited  document preview
						
                                

Preview

SCHUMANN ROSENBERG & AREVALO LLP ERIC AREVALO (CSB N0. 255725) Arevalo@SchumannR0senberg.com MARLYS K. BRAUN (CSB No. 158343) W 09 3 Braun@SchumannR0senberg.com kw 3100 Bristol Street, Suite 100 j i ., «‘1; .{3’ Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Telephone (7 1 4) 850-02 1 0 w z. _. , BY; Cesar H. gepév Depuu Facsimile (7 14) 850-0551 éfiggg fi Attorneys for Defendants, PRISCILLA HUNT and BESSEMER TRUST COMPANY, N.A., as Co-Trustees of the Donald G. Hunt Living Trust, and HUNT ENTERPRISES, INC. @mflfim SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO BY FAx 10 YOLANDA JUAREZ ALVAREZ, an Case No.: CIVDSl916334 LLP individual, Judge: Hon. Thomas S. Garza 11 Department: S-27 Plaintiff, 12 SEPARATE STATEMENT OF AREVALO 13 v. UNDISPUTED MATERIAL FACTS AND 100 92626-7333 SUPPORTING EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT 14 HUNT PRISCILLA LIVING TRUST; CITY OF MOTION BY DEFENDANT, HUNT & LAW SUITE 850-0210 OF FONTANA, and DOES 1 through 100, ENTERPRISES, INC., FOR SUMMARY AT 15 inclusive, JUDGMENT STREET, (714) CALIFORNIA Defendants, [Filed with Notice of Motion, Memorandum 16 ROSENBERG ATTORNEYS 0f Points and Authorities, Appendix 0f Evidence, Request for Judicial Notice, and TELEPHONE: BRISTOL MESA, —and- 17 Motion for Summary Judgment 0f Priscilla 3100 COSTA 18 JUAN HERNANDEZ, an individual, Hunt and Bessemer Trust Company, N.A., as Co-Trustees 0f the Donald G. Hunt Living 19 Nominal Defendant. Trust] SCHUMANN 20 DATE: May 17, 2023 TIME: 8:30 a.m. 21 DEPT.: S—27 22 Date Action Filed: May 3 1, 2019 Trial Date: July 3 1, 2023 23 T0 THIS HONORABLE COURT, ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF 24 RECORD: 25 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN on May 17, 2023, at 8:30 a.m., 0r as soon thereafter as the 26 matter can be héard, in Department S-27 of the above-entitled Court, located at 247 West Third 27 Street, San Bernardino, California, Defendant, HUNT ENTERPRISES, INC. (“Hunt Enterprises”), 28 will and hereby does move, pursuant t0 Code 0f Civil Procedure section 437C and other applicable _1_ SEPARATE STATEMENT ISO MOTION BY DEFENDANT, HUNT ENTERPRISES, FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT statutes and case law, for an Order granting summary judgment in favor of Hunt Enterprises and against Plaintiff, YOLANDA JUAREZ ALVAREZ (“Plaintiff”), on Plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) and its sole cause of action against Hunt Enterprises: the First Cause of Action for Negligence. Hunt Enterprises submits this Separate Statement of Undisputed Material Facts with \quam&w references to the concurrently—filed supporting evidence pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 437c(b) and California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1350 in support 0f its concurrently-filed Motion. [Notez A11 exhibits and the declaration referred t0 herein are attached as identified in the 10 concurrently-filed Appendix 0f Evidence of Defendants, PRISCILLA HUNT and BESSEMER LLP 11 TRUST COMPANY, N.A., as Co—Trustees 0f the DONALD G. HUNT LIVING TRUST, and 12 HUNT ENTERPRISES, INC., Supporting Motions for Summary Judgment] AREVALO 100 13 I. SEPARATE STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED MATERIAL FACTS SUPPORTING 92626-7333 SUITE 14 MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT & LAW 850-0210 AT STREET, (714) 15 CALIFORNIA ROSENBERG ATTORNEYS 16 MOVING PARTY’S UNDISPUTED OPPOSING PARTY’S RESPONSE AND BRISTOL MESA, TELEPHONE: MATERIAL FACTS AND SUPPORTING EVIDENCE: 17 EVIDENCE: 3100 COSTA 18 1. Plaintiff alleges that Decedent, Eric 1. 19 SCHUMANN Dejesus Serrano (“Decadent”), 0n or about 20 July 25, 2018, was riding his motorcycle on 21 “Cherry Avenue, at or about its intersection 22 with Village Drive [in Fontana, California], 23 when a vehicle, exiting the property of the 24 Private Property Defendants failed to yield to 25 oncoming traffic, [and] struck and killed 26 Plaintiffs Decedent” (the “Subject Accident” 27 herein). 28 -2- SEPARATE STATEMENT lSO MOTION BY DEFENDANT, HUNT ENTERPRISES, FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT