arrow left
arrow right
  • A&S METAL RECYCLING INC VS DOES 1 TO 100 Defamation (slander/libel) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • A&S METAL RECYCLING INC VS DOES 1 TO 100 Defamation (slander/libel) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

@ e CM-110. ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Namie, Slate Bar number, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY Jessica Post (Ca Bar No. 247874) Fennemore Craig, P.C. 2394 E. Camelback Road, Ste 600, Phoenix, AZ 85016 TELEPHONE NO. 602-916-5418 FAXNO, (Options): 602-916-5618 FILED E-MAIL ADORESS (Optionay: jpost@fclaw.com Superior Court of California Conese fF ne Anceles ATTORNEY FOR (Name): Cris Carrillo. 1 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF Los ‘Angeles - SEP 28 2018 street aooress: 111 N. Hill Street MAILING ADDRESS: Sherri Ks be ony cavewunre Urticeri Clerk of Court CITY AND zip CODE: Los Angeles, CA 90012 BRANCH NAME:_Central.(Stanley.Mosk.Courthouse) By. x Raul Sancho? arDeputy PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: A&S Metal Recycling, Inc. DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: DOES 1 through 100 CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NUMBER: (Check one): (2). uNtimiTeD case CJ umitep case BC705609 (Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25,000 exceeds $25,000) or less) A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows: Date: October 3, 2018 Time: 8:30am Dept: 69 Div. Room: Address of court (if different from the address above): Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name): Jessica Post (on behalf of Cris Carrillo) INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided, 1. Party or parties (answer one): By Fax a This statement is submitted by party (name): Cris Carrillo b. [2] This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names): Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. The complaint was filed on (date): b. [] The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date): Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a All parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed.: The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint (1) [J have not been served (specify names and explain why not): (2) [1 have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names) (3) E22) have had a default entered against them (specify names): e C) The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which they may be served): 4. Description of case a. Type of case in complaint co cross-complaint (Describe, including causes of action)? sa se Complaint for libel per se, trade libel, intentional interference with economic advantage, negligent interference mo with economic advantage, unfair competition, civil conspiracy, and violation of Penal Code 528.5. 7 oy Page of § Foun Adopted ta: Mandalay Use CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT ~ Cal, Rules of Court, bo CM-110 1 duly 1. 2014] rules 3.720-3,736 werw.gourts.ca gov