On May 09, 2018 a
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT -
was filed
involving a dispute between
A&S Metal Recycling Inc.,
and
Caamano Doe 6 George,
Carrillo Doe 7 Cris,
Crespo Doe 8 Stephanie,
Fernandes Doe 3 Ed,
Kreller Group Inc. Doe 7,
Reyes Doe 4 Sergio,
Roth Doe 2 Aaron,
Water414 Inc. Doe 5,
Wilson'S Metal Exchange Inc. Doe 1,
Carrillo Cris,
Crespo Stephanie,
Segio Reyes- Doe-4,
for Defamation (slander/libel) (General Jurisdiction)
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
@ e
CM-110.
ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Namie, Slate Bar number, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY
Jessica Post (Ca Bar No. 247874)
Fennemore Craig, P.C.
2394 E. Camelback Road, Ste 600, Phoenix, AZ 85016
TELEPHONE NO. 602-916-5418 FAXNO, (Options): 602-916-5618
FILED
E-MAIL ADORESS (Optionay: jpost@fclaw.com Superior Court of California
Conese fF ne Anceles
ATTORNEY FOR (Name): Cris Carrillo. 1
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF Los ‘Angeles - SEP 28 2018
street aooress: 111 N. Hill Street
MAILING ADDRESS: Sherri Ks be ony cavewunre Urticeri Clerk of Court
CITY AND zip CODE: Los Angeles, CA 90012
BRANCH NAME:_Central.(Stanley.Mosk.Courthouse)
By. x
Raul Sancho?
arDeputy
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: A&S Metal Recycling, Inc.
DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: DOES 1 through 100
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NUMBER:
(Check one): (2). uNtimiTeD case CJ umitep case BC705609
(Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25,000
exceeds $25,000) or less)
A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows:
Date: October 3, 2018 Time: 8:30am Dept: 69 Div. Room:
Address of court (if different from the address above):
Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name): Jessica Post (on behalf of Cris Carrillo)
INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided,
1. Party or parties (answer one):
By Fax
a This statement is submitted by party (name): Cris Carrillo
b. [2] This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names):
Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
a. The complaint was filed on (date):
b. [] The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date):
Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
a All parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed.:
The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint
(1) [J have not been served (specify names and explain why not):
(2) [1 have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names)
(3) E22) have had a default entered against them (specify names):
e C) The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which
they may be served):
4. Description of case
a. Type of case in complaint co cross-complaint (Describe, including causes of action)?
sa
se Complaint for libel per se, trade libel, intentional interference with economic advantage, negligent interference
mo with economic advantage, unfair competition, civil conspiracy, and violation of Penal Code 528.5.
7
oy
Page of §
Foun Adopted ta: Mandalay Use CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT ~ Cal, Rules of Court,
bo CM-110 1 duly 1. 2014] rules 3.720-3,736
werw.gourts.ca gov
Document Filed Date
September 25, 2018
Case Filing Date
May 09, 2018
Category
Defamation (slander/libel) (General Jurisdiction)
Status
Request for Dismissal - Before Trial not following ADR or more than 60 days since ADR 04/28/2021
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.