On April 02, 2018 a
Reply - Reply To Defendants' Opposition To Motion To Disqualify Attorney For Defendants (Plaintiff/Cross Defendant's)
was filed
involving a dispute between
Kenp Inc.,
Nguyen Khoa Dinh,
Perez Elmo Jr.,
and
Hoang Mike,
Huynh Tuyet,
Kenp Inc.,
Madrid Anthony A.,
Magnolia World Holding Llc,
Nguyen Calvin T.,
Nguyen Khoa Dinh,
Surgical Endo Llc,
Twenty Seven Trucking,
Www.Surgical-Endo.Com,
for Contractual Fraud (General Jurisdiction)
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
1 CHANGMATTERN Svw°E=§,:*L,l§'?““,°”‘“
E8
GRACE LEA cHAN§B§g #3?e4
‘
°°“""° ’ “‘°
2 JENNIFER ,. LEE, 4
301 E. COLORADO BLVD., SUITE 325 NOV 01 2013
3 PASADENA, CA 91101 _
§626)792—88o8 sum n.cmer.Bx nve°f°°"C‘="‘
4 626)792-6886 FAX By _ om D°"““’
5
Attorney for Plaintiff
6 ELMO PEREZ, JR.
7
8 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
9 FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
10
11 ELMO PEREZ, JR., an Individual, Case No.: BC700475
12 Plaintiff, PLAINTIFF/CROSS-DEFENDANT’S
REPLY TO DEFENDANTS’
13 vs. OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO
DISQUALIFY ATTORNEY FOR
14 KHOA DINH NGUYEN, an Individual; DEFENDANTS
SURGICAL ENDO, LLC, a California Limited
15 Liability Company; Date: November 9, 2018
SURGICAL ENDO, LLC dba Time: 8:30 AM
16 www.surgical-endo.com; Dept.: 62
TWENTY SEVEN TRUCKING, a business
17 entity of unknown type; Complaint filed: April 2, 2018
ANTHONY A. MADRID, an Individual; FSC: March 21, 2019
18 MIKE HOANG, an Individual; Trial: April 2, 2019
CALVIN T. NGUYEN, an Individual;
19 K E N P, Inc., a California Corporation; Dept: 62
and Does 1 through 150 inclusive, Judge: Hon. Michael L. Stern
20
Defendants. Res. ID: 180927352564
21
22 KHOA DINH NGUYEN, an Individual; and
K E N P, Inc., a California Corporation
23
W Cross-Complainants,
I91“: 24
212;: V.
131?; 25
ELMO PEREZ, Jr., an Individual; and
26 ROES 1-50,
27 Cross-Defendants.
28
-1-
°“"'Efv'f'.2IJ‘“” REPLY TO OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISQUALIFY ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANTS
Document Filed Date
November 01, 2018
Case Filing Date
April 02, 2018
Category
Contractual Fraud (General Jurisdiction)
Status
Request for Dismissal - Before Trial not following ADR or more than 60 days since ADR 01/27/2020
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.