arrow left
arrow right
  • ELMO PEREZ JR VS KHOA DINH NGUYEN ET AL Contractual Fraud (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • ELMO PEREZ JR VS KHOA DINH NGUYEN ET AL Contractual Fraud (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 05/01/2019 03:50 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by S. Bolden,Deputy Clerk 1 LAW OFFICES OF VIRGIL L. ROTH, P.C. 2 Virgil L. Roth, Bar No. 72446 625 Fair Oaks Avenue, Suite 255 3 South Pasadena, California 91030 Telephone: (626) 441-1165 4 Facsimile: (626) 441-1166 Email: vroth@vlrlaw.com 5 Attorneys for Defendant Khoa Dinh Nguyen 6 7 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 8 IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL 9 10 ELMO PEREZ, Jr., an Individual, Case No.: BC700475 11 Plaintiff, [Assigned for all purposes to the Honorable lJ")o Michael L. Stern, Dept. 62] V . lJ"\8 N~ 12 • QJ °' vs. 0.. :!:::: ~ """::l. ·-"'E 13 DEFENDANT KHOA DINH NGUYEN'S ~I OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION v f- ~ J? KHOA DINH NGUYEN, an Individual; u: 0 u.. ex: ~ ~ > u 14 SURGICAL ENDO LLC, a California Limited TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES TO 0 <( • FORM INTERROGATORIES, SET ONE 3 ...J. ~"'c Liability Company; .>t 15 SURGICAL ENDO, LLC, dba www.surgical- :5...J"'~ - 0"' v ex: .~ ~ ~ 0.. 16 endo.com; [Filed concurrently with Separate Statement - .r. >lJ")+- TWENTY SEVEN TRUCKING, a business In Support of Opposition; Declaration of N ::l '° 0 V\ 17 entity of unknown type; Virgil L. Roth; Proposed Order] ANTHONY A. MADRID, an Individual; 18 MIKE HOANG, an Individual; Date: May 14, 2019 CALVIN T. NGUYEN, an Individual; Time: 8:30 A.M. 19 Dept: 62 K E N P, Inc. , a California Corporation; 20 and DOES 1 to 150, inclusive, Action Filed: April 2, 2018 21 Defendants. FSC: June 6, 20 19 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Trial: June 17, 2019 22 AND RELATED CROSS-COMPLAINT. 23 24 I. INTRODUCTION 25 Defendant KHOA DINH NGUYEN ("Nguyen") provides this Opposition to Plaintiff 26 ELMO PEREZ, JR. ' S ("Plaintiff') Motion to Compel Further Responses to Plaintiffs Form 27 Interrogatories, Set One. As will be discussed in detail herein, Plaintiffs motion was brought 28 without a legitimate attempt to meet and confer. Plaintiff does not complain about Nguyen's DEFENDANT KHOA DINH NGUYEN'S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF' S MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFF 'S FORM lNTERROGATORIES, SET ONE