On July 17, 2018 a
Motion-Secondary
was filed
involving a dispute between
Dreyer Dr. Jerrold S. Md,
Dreyer Rachel Chaim,
Jerrold S. Dreyer Md Trustee,
Macias Kathy,
and
Jm Capital Investments Llc,
Keyes Carlos,
Lluis Miguel,
Macias Kathy,
Marble Arch Entertainment Llc,
Plainfield Pass Media Llc Aka Plainfield Pass Llc A Delaware Corporation,
Red Entertainment Group,
Williams J. David,
Zsemonadi Donald,
for civil
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
STEVEN T. GUBNER - Bar No. 156593
RICHARD D. BURSTEIN - Bar No. 56661
REAGAN E. BOYCE - Bar No. 248064 FILED
BRUTZKUS GUBNER Superior Court of California
21650 Oxnard Street, Suite 500 Canines «A as Anesleg
Woodland Hills, CA 91367
Telephone: (818) 827-9000 NOV 27 2018
Facsimile: (818) 827-9099
Email:
sherri nm. Career accuuive Ullicer/Clerk
sgubner@bg.law
rburstein@bg.law ty Hath Flora, Deputy
rboyce@bg.law “Teather Flores
Attorneys for Defendant, Miguel Lluis
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
10 CENTRAL DISTRICT
11 DR. JERROLD S. DREYER, MD, an individual Case No. BC714688 D:2
RACHEL CHAIM DREYER, an individual; and Action Filed: July 17, 2018
12 JERROLD S. DREYER, MD AS TRUSTEE OF Judge Assigned: Hon. Patricia D. Nieto
THE JERROLD S. DREYER, MD INC.
13 PENSION FUND AND PROFIT SHARING
PLAN,
14 DEFENDANT MIGUEL LLUIS’ OMNIBUS
Plaintiffs, REPLY TO PLAINTIFFS’ OPPOSITIONS
15 TO DEFENDANT’S DEMURRER AND
v MOTION TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF THE
16 COMPLAINT
JM CAPITAL INVESTMENTS, LLC, a
17 California limited liability corporation; et al., Discovery Cutoff: TBD
Motion Cutoff: TBD
18 Defendants. Trial Date: TBD
19
20
21
Defendant, Miguel Lluis (“Lluis”), hereby replies to the plaintiffs’, Jerrold S. Dreyer, MD,
22
Rachel Chaim Dreyer, and Jerrold S. Dreyer, trustee for the Jerrold S. Dreyer, MD Inc. Pension Plan
23 and Profit Sharing Plan, (collectively, the “Plaintiffs”) Opposition to the Demurrer and Opposition to
24 the Motion to Strike Portions of the Complaint (jointly, the “Opposition”), as follows:
25
I INTRODUCTION
26
Plaintiffs’ Opposition fails to establish that the Complaint, as currently pled, sufficiently
27 alleges the necessary elements for the causes of action alleged against defendant, Miguel Lluis. As
28 set forth more fully in the Demurrer and Motion to Strike, the Complaint (1) fails to allege any time
1
DEFENDNAT MIGUEL LLUIS’ OMNIBUS REPLY TO PLAINTIFFS’ OPPOSITIONS TO DEFENDANT’S
DEMURRER AND MOTION TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF THE COMPLAINT
3865.004
2036600
Document Filed Date
November 27, 2018
Case Filing Date
July 17, 2018
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
STEVEN T. GUBNER - Bar No. 156593 RICHARD D. BURSTEIN - Bar No. 56661 REAGAN E. BOYCE - Bar No. 248064 FILED BRUTZKUS GUBNER Superior Court of California 21650 Oxnard Street, Suite 500 Canines «A as Anesleg Woodland Hills, CA 91367 Telephone: (818) 827-9000 NOV 27 2018 Facsimile: (818) 827-9099 Email: sherri nm. Career accuuive Ullicer/Clerk sgubner@bg.law rburstein@bg.law ty Hath Flora, Deputy rboyce@bg.law “Teather Flores Attorneys for Defendant, Miguel Lluis SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 10 CENTRAL DISTRICT 11 DR. JERROLD S. DREYER, MD, an individual Case No. BC714688 D:2 RACHEL CHAIM DREYER, an individual; and Action Filed: July 17, 2018 12 JERROLD S. DREYER, MD AS TRUSTEE OF Judge Assigned: Hon. Patricia D. Nieto THE JERROLD S. DREYER, MD INC. 13 PENSION FUND AND PROFIT SHARING PLAN, 14 DEFENDANT MIGUEL LLUIS’ OMNIBUS Plaintiffs, REPLY TO PLAINTIFFS’ OPPOSITIONS 15 TO DEFENDANT’S DEMURRER AND v MOTION TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF THE 16 COMPLAINT JM CAPITAL INVESTMENTS, LLC, a 17 California limited liability corporation; et al., Discovery Cutoff: TBD Motion Cutoff: TBD 18 Defendants. Trial Date: TBD 19 20 21 Defendant, Miguel Lluis (“Lluis”), hereby replies to the plaintiffs’, Jerrold S. Dreyer, MD, 22 Rachel Chaim Dreyer, and Jerrold S. Dreyer, trustee for the Jerrold S. Dreyer, MD Inc. Pension Plan 23 and Profit Sharing Plan, (collectively, the “Plaintiffs”) Opposition to the Demurrer and Opposition to 24 the Motion to Strike Portions of the Complaint (jointly, the “Opposition”), as follows: 25 I INTRODUCTION 26 Plaintiffs’ Opposition fails to establish that the Complaint, as currently pled, sufficiently 27 alleges the necessary elements for the causes of action alleged against defendant, Miguel Lluis. As 28 set forth more fully in the Demurrer and Motion to Strike, the Complaint (1) fails to allege any time 1 DEFENDNAT MIGUEL LLUIS’ OMNIBUS REPLY TO PLAINTIFFS’ OPPOSITIONS TO DEFENDANT’S DEMURRER AND MOTION TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF THE COMPLAINT 3865.004 2036600