On July 17, 2018 a
Party Statement
was filed
involving a dispute between
Dreyer Dr. Jerrold S. Md,
Dreyer Rachel Chaim,
Jerrold S. Dreyer Md Trustee,
Macias Kathy,
and
Jm Capital Investments Llc,
Keyes Carlos,
Lluis Miguel,
Macias Kathy,
Marble Arch Entertainment Llc,
Plainfield Pass Media Llc Aka Plainfield Pass Llc A Delaware Corporation,
Red Entertainment Group,
Williams J. David,
Zsemonadi Donald,
for civil
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 01/25/2019 01:47 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by F. Ochoa,Deputy Clerk
CM-110
ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY
Diane Goldman SBN 89681
Law Office of Diane Goldman
21860 Burbank Blvd . , Ste. 360
Woodland Hills, CA 91367
TELEPHONE NO : (818) 883-3344 FAX NO (Optional): (818) 883~3355
E -MAIL ADDRESS (Optional ):
ATTORNEY FOR ( Name): Defendant, KATHY MACIAS
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA , COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
STREET ADDRESS 111 N. Hill St.
MAILING ADDRESS
CITY AND ZIP CODELos Angeles, CA 90012
BRANCH NAME Central -
Stanley Mosk Courthouse
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: DR. JERROLD S. DREYER, MD , et al
DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: JM CAPITAL INVESTMENTS LLC, et al.
CONTINUED CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NUMBER:
(Check one): {gj UNLIMITED CASE I | LIMITED CASE BC714688
(Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25,000
exceeds $25,000) or less)
A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows:
Date: Jan. 31, 2019 Time: 8:30 a.in. Dept .: 24 Div.: Room:
Address of court (if different from the address above):
itfl Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name): Diane Goldman
INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided.
1. Partvor parties ( answer one):
a. 12J This statement is submitted by party (name): Defendant,. Kathy Macias
b. I I This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names ):
2. Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
a. The complaint was filed on (date):
b. The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date):
3. Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only )
a . | | All parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed.
b. ^ The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint
(1) have no been served (specify names and explain why not ):
*
(2) have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names):
(3) have had a default entered against them (specify names):
c. The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and the date by which
they may be served):
4. Description of case
a. Type of case in complaint cross-complaint (Describe, including causes of action):
Breach of fiduciary duty, breach of contract, money had an received,
fraud/deceit, contructive trust , and accounting
Page 1 of 5
Form Adopted for Mandatory Use CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Cal Rules of Court.
.
Judicial Council of California
CM-110 [Rev. July 1, 2011 ]
CFK 1 Essential
Forms
rules 3.720-3.730
www courts ca . gov
ceb.com PI .
Document Filed Date
January 25, 2019
Case Filing Date
July 17, 2018
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.