Order: DR JERROLD S DREYER MD ET AL VS JM CAPITAL INVESTMENTS LLC E

• 
• 

						
                                
Preview
                                SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
                                          Civil Division
                   Central District, Stanley Mosk Courthouse, Department 24

BC714688                                                                            August 4, 2020
DR JERROLD S DREYER MD ET AL VS JM CAPITAL                                              10:30 AM
INVESTMENTS LLC E


Judge: Honorable Patricia D. Nieto                 CSR: None
Judicial Assistant: M. Tran                        ERM: None
Courtroom Assistant: M. Quinteros                  Deputy Sheriff: None

APPEARANCES:
For Plaintiff(s): No Appearances
For Defendant(s): Diane Goldman, Esq. (Telephonic); Arthur Lensky (Telephonic)




NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS: Hearing on Motion to Quash Service of Summons

The case is called for hearing.

All counsel/parties appearing submit to the tentative ruling of the Court.

The tentative ruling becomes the Order of the Court.

The Motion to Quash Service of Summons filed by J. Gerard Legagneur; GL Esquire Consulting,
LLC, GL Esquire Consulting, LLC on 12/02/2019 is Granted.

Cross-Defendants J. Gerard Legagneur and GL Esquire Consulting LLC’s motion to quash
service of summons and complaint is GRANTED.

On July 17, 2018, Plaintiffs Dr. Jerrold S. Dreyer (“Jerrold”), MD, Rachel Chaim Dreyer
(“Rachel”), and Jerrold S. Dreyer, MD, as trustee of the Jerrold S. Dreyer MD Inc. Pension Fund
and Profit Sharing Plan (the “Pension Plan”) (collectively “Plaintiffs”) filed a complaint against
Defendants JM Capital Investments, LLC (“JMCI”), Kathy Macias (“Macias” or “Defendant”),
Plainfield Pass Media, LLC (“Plainfield”), Marble Arch Entertainment, LLC (“Marble”), J.
David Williams (“Williams”), and Miguel Lluis (“Lluis”) (collectively, “Defendants”). The
operative first amended complaint (“FAC”) alleges seven causes of action for: 1) breach of
fiduciary duty; 2) breach of contract; 3) breach of contract; 4) money had and received; 5) fraud
and deceit; 6) constructive trust; and 7) accounting.

Plaintiffs’ action arises from a series of loan agreements related to the funding of several motion
picture projects. Plaintiffs allege that Lluis was trustee of the Pension Plan, and suggested that
Plaintiff consult a financial advisor. Lluis introduced Plaintiffs to Macias, who owns JMCI, and
is associated with Walliams, Plainfield, and Marble. Lluis and Macias did not tell Plaintiffs that
                                           Minute Order                                 Page 1 of 5