On February 21, 2018 a
Order
was filed
involving a dispute between
Los Angeles County Of By And Through,
and
Association For Los Angeles Deputy,
Los Angeles County Employee Relations,
Ramirez Esmeralda Assistant Director Los Angeles County Sheriff'S Department Personnel Administration Bureau,
for civil
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
Civil Division
Central District, Stanley Mosk Courthouse, Department 82
BC712068 May 10, 2022
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES VS ASSOCIATION FOR LOS 9:30 AM
ANGELES DEPUTY
Judge: Honorable Mary H. Strobel CSR: Wanda A. Searcy/CSR 11150
Judicial Assistant: N DiGiambattista ERM: None
Courtroom Assistant: A Flores Deputy Sheriff: None
APPEARANCES:
For Plaintiff(s): Jolina Asuncion Abrena (Telephonic) (X)
For Defendant(s): Jacob Ariel Kalinski (X) (Telephonic)
NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS: STATUS CONFERENCE
Matter comes on for hearing.
.
Counsel for respondent advises the court that there are eight individuals still in dispute and none
are retirees.
.
The court adopts its tentative ruling as the order of the court and is set forth in this minute order.
Cross-Petitioner Association for Los Angeles Deputy Sheriffs (“ALADS”) moved to enforce the
judgment and writ of mandate issued by the court in this action on July 14, 2020, against Cross-
Respondent County of Los Angeles (“County”). The court heard argument on March 17, 2022,
and granted the motion in part in a lengthy minute order. The court continued the hearing for
supplemental briefing on the issue of whether County is required to pay explosives pay to
individuals that were sergeants or lieutenants when the cross-petition was filed. The court has
received supplemental briefs from the parties and now rules on this remaining issue. The court
does not repeat its analysis from the March 17, 2022, minute order, which is incorporated here
by reference.
Judicial Notice
County’s Second Supplemental Request for Judicial Notice, Exhibits 8-9 – Granted.
County’s Supplemental Brief
The court ordered the parties to each file a supplemental brief not to exceed five pages. County
filed a nine-page supplemental brief and ALADS objects. The court is at a loss to understand
how County justifies filing a 9 page brief despite the court’s specific order. County should
Minute Order Page 1 of 7
Document Filed Date
May 10, 2022
Case Filing Date
February 21, 2018
Status
Court Finding - After Court Trial 07/14/2020
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES Civil Division Central District, Stanley Mosk Courthouse, Department 82 BC712068 May 10, 2022 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES VS ASSOCIATION FOR LOS 9:30 AM ANGELES DEPUTY Judge: Honorable Mary H. Strobel CSR: Wanda A. Searcy/CSR 11150 Judicial Assistant: N DiGiambattista ERM: None Courtroom Assistant: A Flores Deputy Sheriff: None APPEARANCES: For Plaintiff(s): Jolina Asuncion Abrena (Telephonic) (X) For Defendant(s): Jacob Ariel Kalinski (X) (Telephonic) NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS: STATUS CONFERENCE Matter comes on for hearing. . Counsel for respondent advises the court that there are eight individuals still in dispute and none are retirees. . The court adopts its tentative ruling as the order of the court and is set forth in this minute order. Cross-Petitioner Association for Los Angeles Deputy Sheriffs (“ALADS”) moved to enforce the judgment and writ of mandate issued by the court in this action on July 14, 2020, against Cross- Respondent County of Los Angeles (“County”). The court heard argument on March 17, 2022, and granted the motion in part in a lengthy minute order. The court continued the hearing for supplemental briefing on the issue of whether County is required to pay explosives pay to individuals that were sergeants or lieutenants when the cross-petition was filed. The court has received supplemental briefs from the parties and now rules on this remaining issue. The court does not repeat its analysis from the March 17, 2022, minute order, which is incorporated here by reference. Judicial Notice County’s Second Supplemental Request for Judicial Notice, Exhibits 8-9 – Granted. County’s Supplemental Brief The court ordered the parties to each file a supplemental brief not to exceed five pages. County filed a nine-page supplemental brief and ALADS objects. The court is at a loss to understand how County justifies filing a 9 page brief despite the court’s specific order. County should Minute Order Page 1 of 7