On April 10, 2017 a
Party Discovery
was filed
involving a dispute between
and
for civil
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
Civil Division
Central District, Stanley Mosk Courthouse, Department 94
17K04244 July 24, 2018
PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY vs PONCE, 8:30 AM
MARCOS
Judge: Honorable Wendy Chang CSR: None
Judicial Assistant: A. Escobar ERM: None
Courtroom Assistant: S. Shumate Deputy Sheriff: None
APPEARANCES:
For Plaintiff(s):J. SAL MUNOZ FOR LAW OFFICE OF J SAL MUFIOZ (Telephonic)
For Defendant(s): No Appearances
NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS: Hearing on Motion - Other to Deem Requests for Admissions
Admitted
The court’s tentative ruling is posted online and in open court for parties to review.
Counsel for the plaintiff checked in but disconnected from CourtCall prior to the matter being
called.
The matter is called for hearing.
The court adopts its tentative ruling as the final order of the court, as follows:
On April 10, 2017, Plaintiff Pacific Bell Telephone Co. (“Plaintiff”) filed a Motion to Deem the
Truth of Matters Specified Its Requests for Admissions as Admitted and to Request for Sanctions
(the “Motion”).
Proof of Service
CCP § 1005(b) states in pertinent part: “[u]nless otherwise ordered or specifically provided by
law, all moving and supporting papers shall be served and filed at least 16 court days before the
hearing. The moving and supporting papers served shall be a copy of the papers filed or to be
filed with the court. However, if the notice is served by mail, the required 16-day period of
notice before the hearing shall be increased by five calendar days if the place of mailing and the
place of address are within the State of California . . . .”
The Court notes that there is no proof of service attached to the moving papers. Thus, the Court
cannot determine if Defendant Anna Babayants (“Babayants”) were properly served with the
Minute Order Page 1 of 2
Document Filed Date
July 24, 2018
Case Filing Date
April 10, 2017
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES Civil Division Central District, Stanley Mosk Courthouse, Department 94 17K04244 July 24, 2018 PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY vs PONCE, 8:30 AM MARCOS Judge: Honorable Wendy Chang CSR: None Judicial Assistant: A. Escobar ERM: None Courtroom Assistant: S. Shumate Deputy Sheriff: None APPEARANCES: For Plaintiff(s):J. SAL MUNOZ FOR LAW OFFICE OF J SAL MUFIOZ (Telephonic) For Defendant(s): No Appearances NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS: Hearing on Motion - Other to Deem Requests for Admissions Admitted The court’s tentative ruling is posted online and in open court for parties to review. Counsel for the plaintiff checked in but disconnected from CourtCall prior to the matter being called. The matter is called for hearing. The court adopts its tentative ruling as the final order of the court, as follows: On April 10, 2017, Plaintiff Pacific Bell Telephone Co. (“Plaintiff”) filed a Motion to Deem the Truth of Matters Specified Its Requests for Admissions as Admitted and to Request for Sanctions (the “Motion”). Proof of Service CCP § 1005(b) states in pertinent part: “[u]nless otherwise ordered or specifically provided by law, all moving and supporting papers shall be served and filed at least 16 court days before the hearing. The moving and supporting papers served shall be a copy of the papers filed or to be filed with the court. However, if the notice is served by mail, the required 16-day period of notice before the hearing shall be increased by five calendar days if the place of mailing and the place of address are within the State of California . . . .” The Court notes that there is no proof of service attached to the moving papers. Thus, the Court cannot determine if Defendant Anna Babayants (“Babayants”) were properly served with the Minute Order Page 1 of 2