On August 30, 2018 a
Judgment
was filed
involving a dispute between
Wells Fargo Bank N.A.,
and
Casillas Diego A,
for Collections Case - Seller Plaintiff (Limited Jurisdiction)
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
JUD-100
ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, state bar number, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY
Jeffery K Mukai
3835 E Thousand Oaks Blvd, Ste R-349
Westlake Village, CA 91362
TELEPHONE NO.: FAX NO. (Optional):
E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional):
ATTORNEY FOR (Name):
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF Los Angeles
STREET ADDRESS: 9425 Penfield Avenue
MAILING ADDRESS:
CITY AND ZIP CODE: Chatsworth, CA. 91311
BRANCH NAME: Chatsworth Courthouse
PLAINTIFF: WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
DEFENDANT: DIEGO A CASILLAS
CASE NUMBER:
JUDGMENT
✔ By Clerk ✔ By Default After Court Trial 18CHLC25060
By Court On Stipulation Defendant Did Not
Appear at Trial
JUDGMENT
1. ✔ BY DEFAULT
a. Defendant was properly served with a copy of the summons and complaint.
b. Defendant failed to answer the complaint or appear and defend the action within the time allowed by law.
c. Defendant's default was entered by the clerk upon plaintiff's application.
d. ✔ Clerk's Judgment (Code Civ. Proc., § 585(a)). Defendant was sued only on a contract or judgment of a court of
this state for the recovery of money.
e. Court Judgment (Code Civ. Proc., § 585(b)). The court considered
(1) plaintiff's testimony and other evidence.
(2) plaintiff's written declaration (Code Civ. Proc., § 585(d)).
2. ON STIPULATION
a. Plaintiff and defendant agreed (stipulated) that a judgment be entered in this case. The court approved the stipulated
judgment and
b. the signed written stipulation was filed in the case.
c. the stipulation was stated in open court the stipulation was stated on the record.
3. AFTER COURT TRIAL. The jury was waived. The court considered the evidence.
a. The case was tried on (date and time):
before (name of judicial officer):
b. Appearances by:
Plaintiff (name each): Plaintiff's attorney (name each):
(1) (1)
(2) (2)
Continued on Attachment 3b.
Defendant (name each): Defendant 's attorney (name each):
(1) (1)
(2) (2)
Continued on Attachment 3b.
c. Defendant did not appear at trial. Defendant was properly served with notice of trial.
d. A statement of decision (Code Civ. Proc., § 632) was not was requested.
Page 1 of 2
Form Approved for Optional Use
Judicial Council of California
JUDGMENT Code of Civil Procedure, §§ 585, 664.6
JUD-100 [New January 1, 2002]
Document Filed Date
January 10, 2019
Case Filing Date
August 30, 2018
Category
Collections Case - Seller Plaintiff (Limited Jurisdiction)
Status
Request for Dismissal - Before Trial not following ADR or more than 60 days since ADR
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.