On August 30, 2018 a
No Value
was filed
involving a dispute between
Wells Fargo Bank N.A.,
and
Casillas Diego A,
for Collections Case - Seller Plaintiff (Limited Jurisdiction)
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
NAME,AOORESS.ANOTELEPHONENUMBEROFATTORNEYORPARTYWITHOUTATTORNEY: STATE BAR Reserved for Clare's Fris Stemp
C. Fullman [SBN 194249], Christopher J. Peters
NUMBER'dam
[SBN 259843], Sam Dehbozorgi [SBN 303033]
THE FULLMAN FIRM, P.C.
250 N. Golden Circle Dr., Suite 207
Santa Ana, CA 92705 Tel/Faxr (888) 922-2367
Diego A. Casillas (Under Limited scope)
ATTQRNEY FQR (Name)
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
COURTHOUSE ADDRESPM
9425 Penfield Ave
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
DEFENDANT)RESPONDENT:
Diego A. Casillas
CASE NUMBER:
PEREMPTORY CHALLENGE TO JUDICIAL OFFICER
(Code Civ. Proc., II 170.6) 18CHLC25060
Name of Judicial Officer: (PRINT) Dept. Number:
ROBERT J. SHUIT F43
k Judge Commissioner Referee
I am a party (or attorney for a party) to this action or special proceeding. The judicial officer named
above, before whom the trial of, or a hearing in, this case is pending, or to whom it has been
assigned, is prejudiced against the party (or his or her attorney) or the interest of the party (or his or
her attorney), so that declarant cannot, or believes that he or she cannot, have a fair and impartial
trial or hearing before the judicial officer.
DECLARATION
I declare under penalty of perjury, under the laws of the State of California, that the
information entered on this form is true and correct.
Filed on behalf of Diego A. Casillas etit(oner Cross Complainant
Name of Party t/Respondent Cross Defendant
o.t.d Cn/stsl)
Iapgffature'YDfVbelat5nt
WOACO~A( . Frr
PrinVed Name
LACIV 016 (Rev. 12-14) Code Civ. Proc., 5 170.8
LASC Approved 044)4
PEREMPTORY CHALLENGE TO JUDICIAL OFFICER
For O peon el Use (Code Civ. Proc., II 170.6)
Document Filed Date
June 25, 2019
Case Filing Date
August 30, 2018
Category
Collections Case - Seller Plaintiff (Limited Jurisdiction)
Status
Request for Dismissal - Before Trial not following ADR or more than 60 days since ADR
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.