arrow left
arrow right
  • VISIONEERING STUDIOS CONST. VS CEDARWOOD CAPITAL PARTNERS Other Real Property (not eminent domain, landlord/tenant, foreclosure) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • VISIONEERING STUDIOS CONST. VS CEDARWOOD CAPITAL PARTNERS Other Real Property (not eminent domain, landlord/tenant, foreclosure) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 11/19/2019 01:07 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by M. Mariscal,Deputy Clerk CM-110 ATTORN .Y OR PAR7Y Wl'I HOOT ATTORNEY (Na ne, Slale Sar numlier, and address( FOR COURT USE ONLY Scott R. Albrecht, SBN 201614/ Anat Pieter, SBN 204306 Green, Steel & Albrecht, LLP 19800 MacArthur Boulevard, Suite 1000 Irvine, CA 92612 YE(EPHOR- No (949) 263-0004 (Ax No (Dplronsii. (949) 263-0005 E-MAILADDREss (opaonoli'aibrecht@gsaattorneys.comlapieter@gsaattorneys.corn ATTQRNEY oR (Name(. Plaintiff Visioneering Studios Construction, Inc. SUPERIOR COURT DF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY DF LOS ANGELES sTREET ADciREss 1725 Main Street MAILING ADDRESS'ITYANDzipcoDE Santa Monica 90401 BRANOH NAME Santa Monica Courthouse PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: VISIONEERING STUDIOS CONSTRUCTION, INC. DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT. CEDARWOOD CAPITAL PARTNERS LA CIENEGA, LLC CASE NUMBER CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT SC129918 (Check one): H UNLIMITED CASE LIMITED CASE (Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $ 25,000 exceeds $ 25,000) or less) A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows: Date. December 3, 2019 Time 8'30 a.m. Dept.: 0 Dlvz Room: Address of court (if different from the address above): El Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name)( Anat Pieter INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided. I Party or parties (answer one): a. H This statement is submitted by party (name): Plaintiff VISIONEERING STUDIOS CONSTRUCTION, INC. b This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names): 2. Complaint and cross-complaint (lo bs answered by plaintiffs snd cross-compiainanis only) a. The complaint was filed on (date) September 27, 2018 b. The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (dais): 3. Service (io be answered by plaintiffs snd cross-compiainanis only) a H All parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed. b. The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint (1) have not been served (specify names snd exp/ain why noi). (2) have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names) (3) have had a default entered against them (specify names): c The following additional part(ca may be added (specify names, nature of (nvoivement (n case, and date by wfliCh they may be served): 4 Description of case a. Type of case in H complaint cross-complaint (Describe, inch(ding causes of action). (1) FORECLOSURE OF MECHANIC'S LIEN; (2) BREACH OF CONTRACT;(3) NEGLIGENCE; (4) EQUITABLE INDEMINTY; (5) DECLARATORY RELIEF Pan I ofn Form Adopled f r Mande(pry Use Cal Rules ofco rl. Judroa'ounut of Calif ma CASE MANAGEIIIIENT STATEMENT rules 3 (20-3 730 CM.110 [Re July I, 2011( unuw nouns na.gos [nn f r 'lY Lf'I M Q)