arrow left
arrow right
  • VISIONEERING STUDIOS CONST. VS CEDARWOOD CAPITAL PARTNERS Other Real Property (not eminent domain, landlord/tenant, foreclosure) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • VISIONEERING STUDIOS CONST. VS CEDARWOOD CAPITAL PARTNERS Other Real Property (not eminent domain, landlord/tenant, foreclosure) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 10/05/2022 02:40 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by M. Mariscal,Deputy Clerk CM-110 ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY Anthony D. Platt, Esq. SBN: 192800 W&D Law, LLP 5 Corporate Park, Ste. 280 Irvine, CA 92606 TELEPHONE NO .. (949) 837-8200 FAX NO. (Optional): (949) 837-9300 E-MAIL ADDRESS: aplatt@wdlaw.com ATTORNEY FOR (Name): Henderson Engineers, Inc. SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES STREET ADDRESS: 1725 Main Street MAILING ADDRESS: 1725 Main Street CITY AND ZIP CODE: Santa Monica, 90401 BRANCH NAME: Santa Monica Courthouse PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Visioneering Studios Construction, Inc. DEFENDANTIRESPONDEN~ Cedarwood Capital Partners LA Cienega, LLC, et al. CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NUMBER: (Check one): DX UNLIMITED CASE D LIMITED CASE (Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25,000 exceeds $25,000) or less) SC129918 A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows: Date: 10/19/2022 Time: 08:30 a.m. Dept: 200 Div.: Room: Address of court (if different from the address above): CJ X Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name): Anthony D. Platt, Esq. INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided. 1. Party or parties (answer one): a. CJ X This statement is submitted by party (name): Henderson Engineers, Inc. b. CJ This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names): 2. Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. The complaint was filed on (date): 09/27/2018 b. CJ The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date): 3. Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. CJX All parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed. b. CJ The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint (1) CJ have not been served (specify names and explain why not): (2) CJ have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names): (3) CJ have had a default entered against them (specify names): c. CJ The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which they may be served): 4. Description of case a. Type of case in CJ X complaint CJ cross-complaint (Describe, including causes of action): 1) Foreclosure of Mechanic's Lien 2) Breach of Contract 3) Breach of Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing 4) Declaratory Relief Page 1 of 5 Form Adopted for Mandatory Use Cal. Rules of Court, Judicial Council of California CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT rules 3.720-3.730 CM-110 [Rev. September 1, 2021] www.courts.ca. gov Westlaw Doc &Fom1 Builder-