On September 27, 2018 a
Party Statement
was filed
involving a dispute between
Visioneering Studios Construction Inc.,
and
Cedarwood Capital Partners La Cienega Llc,
Encompass Construction Corporation,
Henderson Engineers Inc.,
Nxt Studios Inc,
for Other Real Property (not eminent domain, landlord/tenant, foreclosure) (General Jurisdiction)
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 10/05/2022 02:40 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by M. Mariscal,Deputy Clerk
CM-110
ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address):
FOR COURT USE ONLY
Anthony D. Platt, Esq. SBN: 192800
W&D Law, LLP
5 Corporate Park, Ste. 280
Irvine, CA 92606
TELEPHONE NO .. (949) 837-8200 FAX NO. (Optional): (949) 837-9300
E-MAIL ADDRESS: aplatt@wdlaw.com
ATTORNEY FOR (Name): Henderson Engineers, Inc.
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
STREET ADDRESS: 1725 Main Street
MAILING ADDRESS: 1725 Main Street
CITY AND ZIP CODE:
Santa Monica, 90401
BRANCH NAME:
Santa Monica Courthouse
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Visioneering Studios Construction, Inc.
DEFENDANTIRESPONDEN~ Cedarwood Capital Partners LA Cienega, LLC, et al.
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NUMBER:
(Check one): DX UNLIMITED CASE D LIMITED CASE
(Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25,000
exceeds $25,000) or less) SC129918
A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows:
Date: 10/19/2022 Time: 08:30 a.m. Dept: 200 Div.: Room:
Address of court (if different from the address above):
CJ
X Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name): Anthony D. Platt, Esq.
INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided.
1. Party or parties (answer one):
a. CJ
X This statement is submitted by party (name): Henderson Engineers, Inc.
b. CJ This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names):
2. Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
a. The complaint was filed on (date): 09/27/2018
b. CJ The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date):
3. Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
a. CJX All parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed.
b. CJ The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint
(1) CJ have not been served (specify names and explain why not):
(2) CJ have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names):
(3) CJ have had a default entered against them (specify names):
c. CJ The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which
they may be served):
4. Description of case
a. Type of case in CJ
X complaint CJ cross-complaint (Describe, including causes of action):
1) Foreclosure of Mechanic's Lien 2) Breach of Contract 3) Breach of Implied Covenant of Good Faith and
Fair Dealing 4) Declaratory Relief
Page 1 of 5
Form Adopted for Mandatory Use Cal. Rules of Court,
Judicial Council of California
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT rules 3.720-3.730
CM-110 [Rev. September 1, 2021] www.courts.ca. gov
Westlaw Doc &Fom1 Builder-
Document Filed Date
October 05, 2022
Case Filing Date
September 27, 2018
Category
Other Real Property (not eminent domain, landlord/tenant, foreclosure) (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.