arrow left
arrow right
  • MARILYN DINSMORE VS OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, ET AL. Other Complaint (non-tort/non-complex) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • MARILYN DINSMORE VS OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, ET AL. Other Complaint (non-tort/non-complex) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 02/19/2019 12:42 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by L. Herceg,Deputy Clerk Cliil-110 ATTORNEY OR PARTY INITti OUT ATTORNEY (Name, Stale Bar number and address) FOR COURT USE ONLY Erin Jane lllman (CA Bar No. 238262) Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP 214 N. Tryon Street, Suite 3700, Charlotte, NC 28202 TrLEpNoNE No (704) 338-6026 Fnx No (DWioneii (704) 332-8858 E-MAILADDREss (CP(ronai( eillman@bradley.COm ATTORNEY FOR (Name( CIT Bank, N.A. SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES sTREETADDREss 300 East Olive Avenue MAILINGADDRESS cITYAND2IPcoDE'urbank CA 91502 BRANOH NAME Burbank Courthouse PLAINTIFF/PETITIQNER. MARILYNDINSMORE, an individual, DEFENDANT/REsPoNDENT. QCWEN LOAN SERVICING, et al. CASE NUMBER CASE MANAGEMENTSTATEMENT (Check one): CJ3 UNLIMITEDCASE C3 LIMITED CASE EC069124 (Amount demanded {Amount demanded is $ 25,000 exceeds $ 25,000) or less) A CASE MANAGEMENTCONFERENCE is scheduled as follows: Date March 7, 2019 Time: 8:30 AM Dept: A Div: Room Address of court (ifdifferent from the address above): Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name)( Erin J. Illman INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided. 1. Party or parties (answer one): a. ~V b. ~ This statement is submittedby party (name): CIT Bank, N.A, erroneously named as INDYMACIONEWEST This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names). 2 Complaint and cross-complaint (to bs answered by plaintiffs and cross-compiainants on/y) a b ~ The complaint was filed on (date): The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date): 3 a. b. ~ Service (to Ite answered Oy piaintiffs and cross-compiainants only) ~ ~ All parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed. The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint (1) have not been served (specify names and expiain why not). ~ (2) have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names) ~ (3) have had a default entered against them (spemfy names): c. ~ The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of invo/vementin case, snd date by which they may be served): 4. Description of case a. TyPe of case in CH complaint cross-complaint (Describe, including causes of action). Page I of S Cal Rules of Court, Form Adopted for Mandatory Use Jod cist Counc I of California CASE MANAGEMENTSTATEMENT rules 3 720-3 730 CM-110 [Rev July I, 2011l www coons ce gov