arrow left
arrow right
  • MARILYN DINSMORE VS OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, ET AL. Other Complaint (non-tort/non-complex) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • MARILYN DINSMORE VS OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, ET AL. Other Complaint (non-tort/non-complex) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 07/01/2019 02:31 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by A. Rios,Deputy Clerk CM-110 ATTORNEY OR PARTY INI THOU T AT TORNE Y (Name, Stale Bar number and a doves st FOR COURT USE ONLY Erin Jane lllman (CA Bar No. 238262 l Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP 214 N. Tryon Street, Suite 3700, Charlotte, NC 28202 TELEPHoNE No (704) 338-6026 FAx No top»anat/ (704) 332-8858 E-MAIL ADDREss ioplfonali eillmantebradley.COm ATToRNEv FoR /name/ CIT Bank, N.A. SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES sTREETADDREss 300 East Olive Avenue MAILING ADDRESS civv ANozii cooE Burbank, CA 91502 BRANcH NAME Burbank Courthouse PLAINTIFF/PETITIQNER; MARILYN DINSMORE, an individual, DEFENDANT/REsPQNDENT: QCWEN LOAN SERVICING, et al. CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NUMBER (Check one): IX UNLIMITED CASE (Amount demanded M LIMITED CASE (Amount demanded is $ 25,000 EC069124 exceeds $ 25,000) or less) A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows: Date: July 19, 2019 Time; 8:30 AM Dept.: A Divz Room: Address of court (if different from the address above): Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name)7 Erin J. Illman INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided. 1 Party or parties (answer one): ~Y'his a. b. ~ statement is submitted by party (name): CIT Bank, N.A, erroneously named as INDYMAC/ONE WEST This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names): 2. Complaint and cross-complaint (to lie answered hy plaintiffs and cross-comp/Binants only) b ~ a. The complaint was filed on (date): The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date); 3. Service (to he answered by plaintiffs and cross-comp/Binants only) M a. b ~ ~ All parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed. The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint (1) have not been served (specify names and explain why not): ~ (2) have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names): ~ (3) have had a default entered against them (specify names): c. ~ The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature ofinvolvementin case, and date by which they may be served): 4 Description of case a. Type of case in MF complaint M cross-complaint (Describe, including causes of action): Plaintiff's complaint was dismissed at the June 14, 2019 hearing on Defendant CIT's demurrer. Plaintiff was granted ten days leave to amend. Plaintiff amended her complaint on June 25, 2019. Paoa I of 6 Cel. Rutes of Cauli, Form Adopted for Mandatofy Use Judfclal Coundl of Caifomfa CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT tutee 3 720-3 730 CM-110 [Rev July 1, 2011i wivw coons ca gov