On July 10, 2017 a
Hearing
was filed
involving a dispute between
Carrie Teasdale, Betty C,
Carrie Teasdale, Betty C.,
and
Cass, Michael Leroy,
Cass, Peggy Lee,
Does 1-10,
Weaver, Peggy Lee,
for Breach of Contract/Warranty
in the District Court of San Bernardino County.
Preview
su io r a r i Q r iA
BETTY C CARRIE TEASDALE SBN 231285 COUNIY 4 r q Hty Nn
ESQ r fi At nt J i t 1
h
l
Law Office of Betty C Carrie Teasdale
40 7 West Imperial Highway H157
2
Brea California 92821
Telephone 714 326 635
3
Y
Plaintiff and Attorney in Pro Per q
4 p y
5 a
6 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
7 COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINC SAN BERNARDIN4 DISTRICT
9 BETTY C CARRIE TEASDALE an Case Na CIVDS 1712994
individual Consolidated with CIVDS 1803800
10
Plaintiff Assigned far all purposes to
11 Hon Donald Alvarez
vs Department S23
12
MICHAEL LERQY CASS an individual and PLAINTIFF BETTY C CARRIE
DOES 1 ta 10 inclusive TEASDALE S NOTICE OF M4TION
AND MOTION FOR SUlYIMARY
4
Defendants JUDGMENT MEM4RA NDUM OF
POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN
15
SUPPORT TIIEREOF
16
Separate Statement of Undisputed Material
17 Facts and Declaration of Betty C Carrie
Teasdale led separately
g
Date 2019
19 Time 8 30 a m
Dept 523
Date Case Filed July 10 2017
21
22
23
24
25
2b
27
2
NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
CaseNa CIVDS1712990
1 TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD HEREIN
2 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT on D 2019 at 8 30 a m in
3 Department S23 of the above entitled Court located at 247 W Third Street San Bernardino
4 California Plaintiff Betty C Carrie Teasdale Plaintiff will move and hereby does move for
5 summary judgment pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 437c on the ground that there is
6 no triable issue of material fact and Plaintiff is entitled to an adjudication in her favor as a matter
7 of law on her Complaint to quiet title to real property and to cancel a written instrument against
8 Defendant Michael Cass Defendant
9 The undisputed facts presented with this motion establish all the elements of the causes of
10 action and that Defendant has no valid affirmative defense
11 The motion will be based on the pleadings and files herein the attached memorandum of
12 points and authorities the supporting declaration of Betty C Carrie Teasdale including all
13 exhibits thereto the separate statement of undisputed facts filed and served herewith and upon
14
such oral or written evidence as may be introduced at the hearing
15 This motion is made pursuant to Section 437c of the Code of Civil Procedure as there are
16 no triable issues of material fact with respect to the claims set forth in the Complaint and Plaintiff
17 is entitled to judgment as a matter of law
18
19 Date June 10 2019 LAW OFFICE OF BETTY C CARRIE TEASDALE
20
21 G a
Betty C rrie Teasdale Esq
22
Plaintiff and Attorney in Pro Per
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
NOTICE OF MOT10N AND MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
CaseNo CIVDS1712990
Document Filed Date
June 10, 2019
Case Filing Date
July 10, 2017
Category
Breach of Contract/Warranty
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.