On September 20, 2018 a
Minute Order - MINUTE ORDER (MOTION OF RESPONDENTS, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, RIVERSIDE COUNTY ...)
was filed
involving a dispute between
Imperial Irrigation District,
and
Ashley Marion,
County Of Riverside,
Imperial Irrigation District,
Jeffries Kevin,
Perez V. Manuel,
Riverside County Board Of Supervisors,
Tavaglione John F.,
Washington Chuck,
Hewitt Jeff,
Spiegel Karen,
for civil
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
Civil Division
Central District, Stanley Mosk Courthouse, Department 82
BS175175 September 15, 2020
IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT vs. RIVERSIDE 9:30 AM
COUNTY BOARD OF
Judge: Honorable Mary H. Strobel CSR: D Van Dyke/CSR 10795
Judicial Assistant: N DiGiambattista ERM: None
Courtroom Assistant: R Monterroso Deputy Sheriff: None
APPEARANCES:
For Petitioner(s): Emily Brough (Telephonic) , Scott Freedman and Kristin Linsley (X)
For Defendant(s): Alexander Michael Brand (x) (Telephonic)
NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS: MOTION OF RESPONDENTS, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE,
RIVERSIDE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, KEVIN JEFFRIES, JOHN
TAVAGLIONE, CHUCK WASHINTGON, V. MANUEL PEREZ AND MARION ASHLEY,
FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER
Matter, continued from July 16, 2020, comes on for hearing and is argued further.
.
Counsel advise the court that both sides submit on the court's tentative ruling without argument.
The court adopts its tentative ruling as the order of the court and is set forth in this minute order.
. Respondents County of Riverside (“County”), Riverside County Board of Supervisors
(“Board”), Kevin Jeffries, John Tavaglione, Chuck Washington, V. Manuel Perez, and Marion
Ashley (collectively “Respondents”) move for a protective order with respect to special and form
interrogatories, requests for production of documents, and requests for admissions served by
Petitioner Imperial Irrigation District (“Petitioner”). Respondents also move to quash deposition
subpoenas for production of business records served by Petitioner.
Judicial Notice
Petitioner’s RJN Exhibits A-B – Granted.
Procedural History
On July 13, 2018, Petitioner filed its original petition for writ of mandate pursuant to CCP
section 1085 against Respondents. On October 1, 2018, Respondents filed an answer to the
petition.
On November 6, 2018, the court granted Petitioner’s motion for preliminary injunction and
found that Petitioner is likely to prevail on its claim that the Ordinance is preempted by the
Minute Order Page 1 of 8
Document Filed Date
September 15, 2020
Case Filing Date
September 20, 2018
Status
Request for Dismissal - Before Trial not following ADR or more than 60 days since ADR 12/29/2021
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES Civil Division Central District, Stanley Mosk Courthouse, Department 82 BS175175 September 15, 2020 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT vs. RIVERSIDE 9:30 AM COUNTY BOARD OF Judge: Honorable Mary H. Strobel CSR: D Van Dyke/CSR 10795 Judicial Assistant: N DiGiambattista ERM: None Courtroom Assistant: R Monterroso Deputy Sheriff: None APPEARANCES: For Petitioner(s): Emily Brough (Telephonic) , Scott Freedman and Kristin Linsley (X) For Defendant(s): Alexander Michael Brand (x) (Telephonic) NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS: MOTION OF RESPONDENTS, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, RIVERSIDE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, KEVIN JEFFRIES, JOHN TAVAGLIONE, CHUCK WASHINTGON, V. MANUEL PEREZ AND MARION ASHLEY, FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER Matter, continued from July 16, 2020, comes on for hearing and is argued further. . Counsel advise the court that both sides submit on the court's tentative ruling without argument. The court adopts its tentative ruling as the order of the court and is set forth in this minute order. . Respondents County of Riverside (“County”), Riverside County Board of Supervisors (“Board”), Kevin Jeffries, John Tavaglione, Chuck Washington, V. Manuel Perez, and Marion Ashley (collectively “Respondents”) move for a protective order with respect to special and form interrogatories, requests for production of documents, and requests for admissions served by Petitioner Imperial Irrigation District (“Petitioner”). Respondents also move to quash deposition subpoenas for production of business records served by Petitioner. Judicial Notice Petitioner’s RJN Exhibits A-B – Granted. Procedural History On July 13, 2018, Petitioner filed its original petition for writ of mandate pursuant to CCP section 1085 against Respondents. On October 1, 2018, Respondents filed an answer to the petition. On November 6, 2018, the court granted Petitioner’s motion for preliminary injunction and found that Petitioner is likely to prevail on its claim that the Ordinance is preempted by the Minute Order Page 1 of 8