On August 31, 2018 a
Case Management Order
was filed
involving a dispute between
Patterson Jarvis,
and
Budget Wireless California Llc,
for Other Employment Complaint Case (General Jurisdiction)
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
4» . i v & $0
9» - '
' §”gg8lggE;é#FE>Ef2allfornia
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ‘ " "'"""”‘°--°
FORTH]IElg:Jl:ITTl\jI{E(1:JIfl“IS(S§3il§1NGELESH Sh°'”
“A” 1 12019
‘c\.;uI;1Ve(_')mc¢l./Clerk
Patterson v. Budget Wireless California, LLC
BC719426 3’ D,,.,,,
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER
The court has read the Joint Initial Status Conference Response previously led and
issues the following Case Management Order:
. 1. The defendant indicates in the above Joint ISC Response that the plaintiff signed g
. an agreement to arbitrate claims. The plaintiff contests that the agreement is
enforceable.
2. The Court partially lifts the stay previously imposed to permit a hearing on a
defense motion to compel arbitration. This motion is to be led within thirty days.
Defendant is to call the Court prior to ling to get a hearing date and brieng
schedule for this motion. The parties may conduct discovery on the arbitration
. issue only. The Court sets a non-appearance review for March 1, 2019. If no
motion is led by noon on two days before, the defendant is ordered to le a
declaration indicating the status of the arbitration motion.
_ 3. Discover will be phased with the stay lifted pursuant to the above paragraph.
Class Certication and Merits-based discovery remains stayed pending the
V Court’s ruling on the Motion to Compel Arbitration. If there is a dispute
concerning whether or not a given request is arbitration discovery, the parties are
to set up a telephonic conference with the court. i
55$. 4. Protective Order. Parties must use as a template one of the model protective order
found at htt://www.lacourt.or0'/division./civil/CT10043as)x. Any changes to this
1
Document Filed Date
January 11, 2019
Case Filing Date
August 31, 2018
Category
Other Employment Complaint Case (General Jurisdiction)
Status
Stipulated Judgment - Before Trial 07/22/2022
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
4» . i v & $0 9» - ' ' §”gg8lggE;é#FE>Ef2allfornia SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ‘ " "'"""”‘°--° FORTH]IElg:Jl:ITTl\jI{E(1:JIfl“IS(S§3il§1NGELESH Sh°'” “A” 1 12019 ‘c\.;uI;1Ve(_')mc¢l./Clerk Patterson v. Budget Wireless California, LLC BC719426 3’ D,,.,,, CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER The court has read the Joint Initial Status Conference Response previously led and issues the following Case Management Order: . 1. The defendant indicates in the above Joint ISC Response that the plaintiff signed g . an agreement to arbitrate claims. The plaintiff contests that the agreement is enforceable. 2. The Court partially lifts the stay previously imposed to permit a hearing on a defense motion to compel arbitration. This motion is to be led within thirty days. Defendant is to call the Court prior to ling to get a hearing date and brieng schedule for this motion. The parties may conduct discovery on the arbitration . issue only. The Court sets a non-appearance review for March 1, 2019. If no motion is led by noon on two days before, the defendant is ordered to le a declaration indicating the status of the arbitration motion. _ 3. Discover will be phased with the stay lifted pursuant to the above paragraph. Class Certication and Merits-based discovery remains stayed pending the V Court’s ruling on the Motion to Compel Arbitration. If there is a dispute concerning whether or not a given request is arbitration discovery, the parties are to set up a telephonic conference with the court. i 55$. 4. Protective Order. Parties must use as a template one of the model protective order found at htt://www.lacourt.or0'/division./civil/CT10043as)x. Any changes to this 1