arrow left
arrow right
  • OLUFEMI OGUNTOLU VS NINA C MONTOYA Other Real Property (not eminent domain, landlord/tenant, foreclosure) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • OLUFEMI OGUNTOLU VS NINA C MONTOYA Other Real Property (not eminent domain, landlord/tenant, foreclosure) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 12/03/2019 11:10 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by R. Sanchez,Deputy Clerk 1 Shannon Seibert (CBN 240317) seibert@sbm.law 2 Joe Bautista (CBN 255708) bautista@sbm.law 3 SEIBERT BAUTISTA MONTOYA 4 2100 Embarcadero, Ste. 203 Oakland, CA 94606 5 Tel: 510.679.1981 Fax: 510.679.1982 6 Attorneys for Defendant 7 8 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA 9 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES – STANLEY MOSK 10 OLUFEMI OGUNTOLU, 11 CASE NO.: BC722093 Plaintiff, 12 DEFENDANT’S OPPOSITION TO vs. PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST TO SEVER ISSUES 13 OF LAW AT TRIAL FOR DETERMINATION NINA MONTOYA, 14 BY THE COURT BEFORE REMAINING Defendant. QUESTIONS OF FACT ARE PRESENTED TO 15 THE JURY 16 Date: December 4, 2019 Time: 8:30 a.m. 17 Dept.: 36 18 Complaint Filed: September 19, 2018 19 FAC Filed: October 19, 2018 Trial Date: December 11, 2019 20 21 I. 22 INTRODUCTION 23 Plaintiff previously filed a motion to bifurcate under Code of Civil Procedure section 591, 24 592, 598 and 1048(b) which was taken under submission by this court on November 12, 2019 and 25 denied on November 27, 2019. Plaintiff now improperly brings yet another noticed motion on the 26 same matter before this court. This is improper for three reasons. First, because a party cannot bring 27 _________________________________________________________________________________________________ 28 1 OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST TO SEVER ISSUES OF LAW