Document for OLUFEMI OGUNTOLU VS NINA C MONTOYA

• 
• 

						
                                
Preview
                                Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 12/04/2019 08:21 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by J. So,Deputy Clerk



                 1      Shannon Seibert (CBN 240317)
                        seibert@sbm.law
                 2      Joe Bautista (CBN 255708)
                        bautista@sbm.law
                 3
                        SEIBERT BAUTISTA MONTOYA
                 4      2100 Embarcadero, Ste. 203
                        Oakland, CA 94606
                 5      Tel: 510.679.1981
                        Fax: 510.679.1982
                 6
                        Attorneys for Defendant
                 7
                                                                     SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
                 8
                                                           COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES – STANLEY MOSK
                 9

                10           OLUFEMI OGUNTOLU,
                                                                                                  CASE NO.: BC722093
                11                                   Plaintiff,
                                                                                                  DEFENDANT’S OPPOSITION TO
                                        vs.
                12                                                                                PLAINTIFF’S MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 2 ON
                                                                                                  THE BASIS THAT THE MOTION
                13           NINA MONTOYA,
                                                                                                  IMPERMISSIBLY ASKS THE COURT TO
                14                                  Defendant.                                    DECIDE ULTIMATE ISSUES OF FACT,
                                                                                                  RECONSIDER ITS PRIOR RULINGS,
                15                                                                                EXCLUDE ADMISSIBLE AND PROBATIVE
                                                                                                  EVIDENCE, GRANT AN EVIDENTIARY
                16                                                                                SANCTION, AND IS NOT SUPPORTED BY A
                                                                                                  RULE 3.57-COMPLIANT DECLARATION
                17

                18                                                                                Date:                             December 11, 2019
                                                                                                  Time:                             8:30 a.m.
                19                                                                                Dept.:                            36
                20                                                                                Trial Date:                       January 22, 2020
                21

                22

                23

                24

                25

                26

                27
                        _________________________________________________________________________________________________
                28
                                                                                                      1
                                                      DEFENDANT’S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 2