Document for ANTONIO RAMOS, ET AL VS. HOME CONSTRUCTION SOLUTIONS CORP.

• 
• 

						
                                
Preview
                                1    Robert H. Dewberry, State Bar No. 89354
              theDewberryfirm
         2    34 Executive Park Suite 210                                               F
              Irvine, CA 92614                                                                     »-
         3     (949) 955-2940                                                  Superior Court aflcjam-omia
               Fax (949) 209-3883                                                County of Los Ange,“
         4     robert.dewberry@dew|aw.net

          5   Att orneys for D een
                                f d an t                                 sh    H3’ J.          _
               DANIEL KENNEY                                             3:" C“ W‘ L‘ f",° Officer/Clerk
          6                                                                     Vauessala aricio        .DepuIy


          7

          8                                   SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA

          9                         COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, NORTHWEST DISTRICT

         10
         11   ANTONIO RAMOS and PETRA RAMOS,                  Case No. LC107846

                                    Plaintiffs,              ‘PROPOSED ANSWER TO UNVERIFIED
         12                                                   COMPLAINT
         13              vs.

               HOME CONSTRUCTION SOLUTIONS                    Complaint Filed: 9/25/2018
         14    CORP., et. al.;                                Trial: Not Set

         15                         Defendants.
         16
         17          Defendant, DANIEL KENNEY, answers the unverified Complaint (”Comp|aint”) as

         13   follows:

         19          1.        The Complaint being unverified, Defendant generally and specifically

         20   denies every material allegation, and denies that Plaintiff is entitled to any recovery.

         21                                       FIRST AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
         22
                     2.         Defendant alleges that throughout the Complaint, Plaintiff has failed to
         23
         24   allege facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.

         25                                       SECOND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE

         26          3.         Defendant is informed and believes and thereon alleges that the

         27   Complaint, as well as each of its purported causes of action, is barred by the applicable
xiii‘

         28   California Statutes of Limitations, including without limitation Code of Civil Procedure
 ‘J1;                                                         ‘1'
l"i'i‘                               F               ANSWER TO UNVERIFIED COMPLAINT