arrow left
arrow right
  • MIDLAND FUNDING LLC VS RENEE CARLIN Collections Case - Purchased Debt (Charged Off Consumer Debt Purchased on or after January 1,2014) (Limited Jurisdiction) document preview
  • MIDLAND FUNDING LLC VS RENEE CARLIN Collections Case - Purchased Debt (Charged Off Consumer Debt Purchased on or after January 1,2014) (Limited Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

JUD-100 ‘ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY JACK H. POGOSIAN, State Bar No.: 305741 / MANASI TAHILIANI, State Bar No.: 272821 / CHRISTINA ARNOLD, State Bar No.: 297590 / HYO JIN JULIA JUNG, State Bar No.: 316090 / MELINE GRIGORYAN, State Bar No.: 321133 / CAROLINA PINHEIRO, State Bar No.: 259875 MIDLAND FUNDING LLC. 350 CAMINO DE LA REINA, SUITE 100 FILED Superior Court of California SAN DIEGO, CA 92108 Countyof Los Angales TELEPHONE NO.:(866) 300-8750. FAX NO. (Optional): (858) 309-1588 E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional): 03/02/2020 ATTORNEY FOR (Name): MIDLAND FUNDING LLC Sher R Carter, Exccutve Office / Cenk aflCour |UPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 8 C. Mason Deguty STTEET ADDRESS: 12720 NORWALK BLVD. MAILING ADDRESS: CITY AND ZIP CODE: NORWALK CA 90650 BRANCH NAME: NORWALK COURTHOUSE SOUTHEAST DISTRICT - LIMITED CIVIL JURISDICTION PLAINTIFF: MIDLAND FUNDING LLC DEFENDANT: RENEE CARLIN JUDGMENT CASE NUMBER: C1 By Clerk XX] By Default C0 After Court Trial 19NWLCO08182 XX] By Court LD on Stipulation CO Defendant Did Not Appear at Trial JUDGMENT 1. K] BY DEFAULT a Defendant was properly served with a copy of the summons and complaint. b. . Defendant failed to answer the complaint or appear and defend the action within the time allowed by law. c. Defendant's default was enterec by the clerk upon plaintiff's application. d. |. []_ Clerk's Judgment (Code Civ. Proc., § 585(a)). Defendant was sued only on a contract or judgment of a court of this State for the recovery of money. e. Xl Court Judgment (Code Civ. Proc., § 585(b)). The court considered (1) (1 plaintiff's testimony and other evidence. (2) RX] plaintit's written declaration (Code Civ. Proc., § 585(d)). 2. [] ON STIPULATION a. Plaintiff and defendant agreed (stipulated) that a judgment be entered in this case, The court approved the stipulated judgment and 6 1 the signed written stipulation was filed in the case. ce CT] the stipulation was stated in open court 1 the stipulation was stated on the record. 3. [-] AFTER COURT TRIAL. The jury was waived. The court considered the evidence. a. The case was tried on (date and time): before (name of judicial officer): c. Appearances by: Oo Plaintiff (name each): (1 Plaintiff's attorney (name each): (1) (1) (2) (2) oO Continued on Attachment 3b. oO Defendant (name each): (1 Defendant's attorney (name each): () (1) (2) (2) oO Continued on Attachment 3b. c. o Defendant did not appear at trial. Defendant was properly served with notice of trial. dad 0 A statement of decision (Code Civ. Proc., § 632) 1 was not OO was requested. Page 1 of2 Form Approved for Optional Use JUDGMENT Code of Civil Procedure, §§ 585, 664.6 Judicial Council of California ‘JUD-100 [New January 1, 2003) CA_0402G File No.: 18-380068 6020-022600817 2020022612:72 Page 8 of46 8 of 46