On February 26, 2019 a
Judgment
was filed
involving a dispute between
Midland Funding Llc,
and
Carlin Renee,
for Collections Case - Purchased Debt (Charged Off Consumer Debt Purchased on or after January 1,2014) (Limited Jurisdiction)
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
JUD-100
‘ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY
JACK H. POGOSIAN, State Bar No.: 305741 / MANASI TAHILIANI, State Bar No.: 272821 /
CHRISTINA ARNOLD, State Bar No.: 297590 / HYO JIN JULIA JUNG, State Bar No.: 316090 / MELINE
GRIGORYAN, State Bar No.: 321133 / CAROLINA PINHEIRO, State Bar No.: 259875
MIDLAND FUNDING LLC.
350 CAMINO DE LA REINA, SUITE 100
FILED
Superior Court of California
SAN DIEGO, CA 92108
Countyof Los Angales
TELEPHONE NO.:(866) 300-8750. FAX NO. (Optional): (858) 309-1588
E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional): 03/02/2020
ATTORNEY FOR (Name): MIDLAND FUNDING LLC Sher R Carter, Exccutve Office / Cenk aflCour
|UPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 8 C. Mason Deguty
STTEET ADDRESS: 12720 NORWALK BLVD.
MAILING ADDRESS:
CITY AND ZIP CODE: NORWALK CA 90650
BRANCH NAME: NORWALK COURTHOUSE SOUTHEAST DISTRICT - LIMITED CIVIL
JURISDICTION
PLAINTIFF: MIDLAND FUNDING LLC
DEFENDANT: RENEE CARLIN
JUDGMENT CASE NUMBER:
C1 By Clerk XX] By Default C0 After Court Trial 19NWLCO08182
XX] By Court LD on Stipulation CO Defendant Did Not
Appear at Trial
JUDGMENT
1. K] BY DEFAULT
a Defendant was properly served with a copy of the summons and complaint.
b. . Defendant failed to answer the complaint or appear and defend the action within the time allowed by law.
c. Defendant's default was enterec by the clerk upon plaintiff's application.
d. |. []_ Clerk's Judgment (Code Civ. Proc., § 585(a)). Defendant was sued only on a contract or judgment of a court of this
State for the recovery of money.
e. Xl Court Judgment (Code Civ. Proc., § 585(b)). The court considered
(1) (1 plaintiff's testimony and other evidence.
(2) RX] plaintit's written declaration (Code Civ. Proc., § 585(d)).
2. [] ON STIPULATION
a. Plaintiff and defendant agreed (stipulated) that a judgment be entered in this case, The court approved the stipulated
judgment and
6 1 the signed written stipulation was filed in the case.
ce CT] the stipulation was stated in open court 1 the stipulation was stated on the record.
3. [-] AFTER COURT TRIAL. The jury was waived. The court considered the evidence.
a. The case was tried on (date and time):
before (name of judicial officer):
c. Appearances by:
Oo Plaintiff (name each): (1 Plaintiff's attorney (name each):
(1) (1)
(2) (2)
oO Continued on Attachment 3b.
oO Defendant (name each): (1 Defendant's attorney (name each):
() (1)
(2) (2)
oO Continued on Attachment 3b.
c. o Defendant did not appear at trial. Defendant was properly served with notice of trial.
dad 0 A statement of decision (Code Civ. Proc., § 632) 1 was not OO was requested.
Page 1 of2
Form Approved for Optional Use JUDGMENT Code of Civil Procedure, §§ 585, 664.6
Judicial Council of California
‘JUD-100 [New January 1, 2003)
CA_0402G File No.: 18-380068
6020-022600817 2020022612:72 Page 8 of46 8 of 46
Document Filed Date
March 02, 2020
Case Filing Date
February 26, 2019
Category
Collections Case - Purchased Debt (Charged Off Consumer Debt Purchased on or after January 1,2014) (Limited Jurisdiction)
Status
Default Judgment By Court - Before Trial
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.