Motion-Secondary: FORMOSA FABRIC INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION VS OMID LAVI, ET AL.

• 
• 

						
                                
Preview
                                Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 07/01/2019 04:37 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by R. Sanchez,Deputy Clerk




               1      NICO N. TABIBI, ESQ. (169036)
                      LAW OFFICES OF NICO N. TABIBI, APC
               2      9454 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD, PENTHOUSE
               3      BEVERLY HILLS, CALIFORNIA 90212-2929
                      TELEPHONE: (310) 276-1555
               4      FACSIMILE: (310) 273-1606
               5      Attorneys for Plaintiff, FORMOSA FABRIC, INC.,
               6      a California corporation

               7
               8
                                                    SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
               9
                                            FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES – CENTRAL DISTRICT
             10
             11       FORMOSA FABRIC INC., a California                                               CASE NO. 19STCV06666
                      corporation,                                                                    [Assigned to Dept. 86, Hon. Mitchell L. Beckloff for right
             12                                                                                       to attach application and related hearings]
                                                                                                      [Assigned to Dept. 37, Hon. Richard Burdge for all other
             13                                         Plaintiff,                                    proceedings]

             14                                                                                       DATE: July 3, 2019
                                             vs.                                                      DEPT.: 86
             15                                                                                       TIME: 9:30 A.M.
                      LAVITEX, INC., a California corporation; OMID
             16       LAVI an individual; ARTE MILANO TEXTILE
                      INC., a California corporation; and DOES 1    REPLY OF PLAINTIFF TO DEFENDANT’S
             17       through 50, inclusive,                        OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S
                                                                    APPLICATION FOR RIGHT TO ATTACH
             18                              Defendants.
                                                                    ORDER
             19
                       AND RELATED CROSS-ACTION.                                                      [Concurrently filed with Objections to Evidence:
             20                                                                                       i.e. Objections to Declarations of: (a) Omid Lavi
                                                                                                      (both declarations), (b) Luz Emma Villalobos De
             21                                                                                       Ruiz, (c) Suk Young Lim re: Style Nos. 3031
                                                                                                      and 1031, (d) Scott R. Van Horn; as well as
             22                                                                                       Objection to Notice of Lodging Fabric
                                                                                                      Exemplars; and proposed order thereon]
             23
             24                  COMES NOW Plaintiff, FORMOSA FABRIC INC., a California corporation (hereinafter
             25       “Plaintiff”), and hereby submits this Reply in Support of Plaintiff’s Application for Right To Attach
             26       Order and Order for Issuance of a Writ of Attachment, and Temporary Protective Order as follows:
             27       //
             28                                                                                   1
                                                          REPLY OF PLAINTIFF TO DEFENDANT’S OPPOSITION
                                                      TO PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION FOR RIGHT TO ATTACH ORDER