On February 26, 2019 a
Party Statement
was filed
involving a dispute between
Formosa Fabric Inc.,
Lavi Omid,
Lavitex Inc.,
and
Arte Milano Textile Inc.,
Lavi Omid,
Lavitex Inc.,
for civil
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 02/05/2020 03:38 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by M. Jenkins,Deputy Clerk
AITORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY
CM 110-
Alan J. Cohen, [SBN 102644]
Law Offices of Alan J. Cohen
1880 Century Park East, Suite 315
Los Angeles, California 90067
TELEPHONE NO., 424-2] 0-339] FAX NO. (Optional):
E-MAIL ADDREss (Opffonal!'
acohen@cohenlawla.com
ATTORNEY FOR rNama!' Omid Lavi and Arte Milano Textile Inc
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF Los Angeles
STREET ADDREss, Ill N. Hill Street
MAILING ADDRESS:
CITY AND z1P
coDE' Los Angeles, CA 90012
BRANcH NAME' Stanley Mosk
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER:Formosa Fabric Inc., etc.
DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT:Lavitex, Inc., et al.
CASE NUMBER:
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT
(Check one): [X] UNLIMITED CASE 0 LIMITED CASE !9STCV06666
(Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25,000
exceeds $25,000) or less)
A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows:
Date: February 20, 2020 Time: 8:30a.m. Dept.: 37 Div.: Room:
Address of court (if different from the address above):
[X] Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name): Alan J.Cohen
INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided.
1. Party or parties (answer one):
a. [X] This statement is submitted by party (name):Defendants Omid Lavi and Arte Milano Textile Inc.
b. D This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names):
2. Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
a. The complaint was filed on (date):
b. D The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date):
3. Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
a. D All parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed.
b. D The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint
(1) D have not been served (specify names and explain why not):
(2) D have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names):
(3) D have had a default entered against them (specify names):
c. D The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which
they may be served):
4. Description of case
a. Type of case in D complaint [X] cross-complaint (Describe, including causes of action):
Complaint for breach of contract, common cotmts, fraudulent transfers, injunctive relief and equitable
relief; Cross-Complaint for related causes of action
Pa e1of5
Form Adopted for Mandatory Use Cal. Rules of Court,
Judicial Council of California CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT rules 3.720--3.730
CM-110 [Rev. July 1, 20111
Document Filed Date
February 05, 2020
Case Filing Date
February 26, 2019
Status
Request for Dismissal - Before Trial not following ADR or more than 60 days since ADR 05/06/2021
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.