arrow left
arrow right
  • 632 N PALM DRIVE, LLC VS ADAN PENA, ET AL. Contractual Fraud (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • 632 N PALM DRIVE, LLC VS ADAN PENA, ET AL. Contractual Fraud (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by $luperior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 01/13/2020 10:51 AM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by J . Bradley, Deputy Cler 1 SEAN P. REYNOLDS, ESQ., State Bar No. 249649 US CONSTRUCTION LAW, A Law Corporation 2 3433 Corte Altura Carlsbad CA, 92009 3 T: (760) 452-5752 sreynolds@usclawcorp.com Attorneys for Defendants GOLD PACIFIC CONSTRUCTION, INC., ADAN PENA and SURETEC INDEMNITY COMPANY SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 10 632 N PALM DRIVE, LLC. CASE NO.: 19SMCV00434 (Complaint filed: March 5, 2019) 11 Plaintiff, OPPOSITION OF GOLD PACIFIC 12 Vv. CONSTRUCTION, INC. TO PLAINTIFF’S 36 ZE DEMURRER TO CROSS-COMPLAINT 13 GOLD PACIFIC CONSTRUCTION, INC., AND REQUEST FOR MONETARY 6 Os a California corporation, ADAN PENA, an SANCTIONS IN THE AMOUNT OF 14 individual; SURETEC INDEMNITY $4,850.15 AGAINST PLAINTIFF AND 28 eS COMPANY, a California corporation, and COUNSEL PURSUANT TO CCP §§128.5, ne 15 DOES 1-20 128.7. Z< Defendants. On O< 16 Dept.: M Judge: Hon. Mark A. Young 17 AND RELATED CROSS-ACTIONS Date: January 28, 2019 Time: 8:30 a.m. 18 19 Table of Contents 20 I. 632’°S DEMURRER IS UNTIMELY 21 II. THIS COURT IS EMPOWERED TO SUSTAIN ALL CAUSES OF ACTION IN 22 GOLD’S CROSS-COMPLAINT 23 III. GOLD’S CLAIMS AGAINST COHEN ARE PROPERLY PLED 24 IV. 632’°S CONCLUSION WITHOUT ARGUMENT TO GOLD’ BREACH OF CONTRACT CLAIM IS FRIVOLOUS 25 V. 632’S CONCLUSION TO DEMURER TO THE BREACH OF IMPLIED 26 COVENANT OF GOOD FAITH AND FAIR DEALING IS FRIVOLOUS 10 27 VI. GOLD’S MISREPRESENTATION CLAIMS ARE PROPER. 11 28 VII. GOLD’S NEGLIGENCE CLAIM IS PROPER 12 1 OPPOSITION TO DEMURRER