arrow left
arrow right
  • 632 N PALM DRIVE, LLC VS ADAN PENA, ET AL. Contractual Fraud (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • 632 N PALM DRIVE, LLC VS ADAN PENA, ET AL. Contractual Fraud (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 11/06/2020 09:11 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by M. Mohammadi,Deputy Clerk 1 SEAN P. REYNOLDS, ESQ., State Bar No. 249649 US CONSTRUCTION LAW, A Law Corporation 2 3433 Corte Altura Carlsbad CA, 92009 3 T: (760) 452-5752 sreynolds@usclawcorp.com 4 Attorneys for Defendants GOLD PACIFIC 5 CONSTRUCTION, INC., ADAN PENA and SURETEC INDEMNITY COMPANY 6 7 8 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 9 FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 10 632 N PALM DRIVE, LLC. CASE NO.: 19SMCV00434 (Complaint filed: March 5, 2019) 11 Plaintiff, US CONSTRUCTION LAW OBJECTION TO PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE 12 v. OF RULING DATED 11/2/2020 RE: A LAW CORPORATION HEARING OF 10/30/2020 13 GOLD PACIFIC CONSTRUCTION, INC., a California corporation, ADAN PENA, an [UNLIMITED CIVIL CASE] 14 individual; SURETEC INDEMNITY COMPANY, a California corporation, and Dept.: M 15 DOES 1-20 Judge: Hon. Mark A. Young Defendants. 16 ---------------------------------------------------- 17 AND RELATED CROSS-ACTIONS 18 19 Defendants/Cross-Complainants GOLD PACIFIC CONSTRUCTION, INC. and 20 ADAN PENA and (“GOLD”) respectfully submit the following Objection to the Notice of 21 Ruling, (“NOR”) of Plaintiff 632 N PALM DRIVE, LLC (“632,”) and Court’s Order, 22 (“Order”) regarding the hearing on 632’s Motions to compel further responses to form 23 interrogatories and request for production of documents (“Motions”) held October 30, 2020 24 presided by Judge Young. 1 25 I.STATEMENT OF FACTS AND ARGUMENT 26 On October 30, 2020, hearing on 632’ Motions were held. Counsel for GOLD raised 27 1 GOLD requests this Court take judicial notice of this Court’s Order, and 632’s NOR pursuant to Evid. Cod. §§452(d), (h), and 453. 28 1 OBJECTION TO PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF RULING DATED 11/2/2020 RE: HEARING OF 10/30/2020