arrow left
arrow right
  • JORGE POLZIN VS UCLA HEALTH Other Employment Complaint Case (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • JORGE POLZIN VS UCLA HEALTH Other Employment Complaint Case (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 05/27/2021 05:46 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by K. Hung,Deputy Clerk 1 ADAM REISNER, ESQ., (State Bar No. 204351) TESSA KING, ESQ., (State Bar No. 251408) 2 ALYSSA ROMANINI, ESQ. (State Bar No.325792) REISNER & KING LLP 3 15303 Ventura Blvd., Suite 1260 Sherman Oaks, California 91403 4 Phone: (818) 981-0901 Fax: (818) 981-0902 5 Attorneys for Plaintiff JORGE POLZIN 6 7 8 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 9 FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 10 JORGE POLZIN, ) Case No. 19STCV04889 11 Plaintiff, [Assigned for all purposes to the 12 Hon. Judge Michelle Williams, Dept.74] vs. 13 UCLA HEALTH; and PLAINTIFF'S MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 14 DOES 1 THROUGH 100, inclusive, 5 TO EXCLUDE ANY AND ALL 15 REFERENCE TO EVIDENCE NOT Defendants. PRODUCED BY DEFENDANTS IN 16 DISCOVERY THAT WAS REQUESTED REGARDING ENNILY CHAN'S AND 17 ALICE CHANG'S ALLEGED 18 INTERVIEWING OF, OR APPLICANTS APPLYING FOR, POSITIONS WITH 19 MILITARY EXPERIENCE. 20 21 22 23 TO ALL PARTIES AND TO THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD HEREIN: l TRIAL: TIME: DEPT: June 14, 2021 10:00 a.m. 74 24 Plaintiff, JORGE POLZIN, requests by this Motion in Limine, that the Court preclude 25 Defendant from introducing any evidence regarding or making any reference to evidence not 26 27 28 PLAINTIFF'S MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 5 TO EXCLUDE ANY AND ALL REFERENCE TO EVIDENCE NOT PRODUCED BY DEFENDANTS IN DISCOVERY THAT WAS REQUESTED REGARDING ENNILY CHAN'S AND ALICE CHANG'S ALLEGED INTERVIEWING OF, OR APPLICANTS APPLYING FOR, POSITIONS WITH MILITARY EXPERIENCE.