arrow left
arrow right
  • 632 N PALM DRIVE, LLC VS ADAN PENA, ET AL. Contractual Fraud (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • 632 N PALM DRIVE, LLC VS ADAN PENA, ET AL. Contractual Fraud (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES Civil Division West District, Santa Monica Courthouse, Department M 19SMCV00434 January 12, 2021 632 N PALM DRIVE, LLC vs ADAN PENA, et al. 3:10 PM Judge: Honorable Mark A. Young CSR: None Judicial Assistant: K. Metoyer ERM: None Courtroom Assistant: None Deputy Sheriff: None APPEARANCES: For Plaintiff(s): No Appearances For Defendant(s): No Appearances NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS: Nunc Pro Tunc Order Through inadvertence and clerical error a docket line entry was made indication a 170.6 was filed by Chris Sunderlin in this case (19SMCV00434). However, the 170.6 peremptory challenge by Chris Sunderlin was filed in case (20SMCV01236). A separate 170.6 peremptory challenge was not submitted in this case. Therefore, the following is issued as follows: It appearing to the Court that through inadvertence and/or clerical error, the minute order of 11/25/2020 in the above-entitled action does not properly reflect the Court's order. Said minute order is ordered corrected nunc pro tunc as of 11/25/20, as follows: By striking: The Court reviews the Peremptory Challenge filed by Defendant pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 170.6 and finds that it was timely filed, in proper format, and is accepted. By adding: In addition, the docket line entry of 10/30/20 peremptory challenge in this case (19SMCV00434) is removed. Clerk to give notice. Certificate of Mailing is attached. Minute Order Page 1 of 1