arrow left
arrow right
  • 632 N PALM DRIVE, LLC VS ADAN PENA, ET AL. Contractual Fraud (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • 632 N PALM DRIVE, LLC VS ADAN PENA, ET AL. Contractual Fraud (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 03/16/2021 04:08 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by V. Yonker,Deputy Clerk 1 Jack M. Zakariaie (Bar No. 168776) Nilou Zakariaie (Bar No. 168466) 2 ZAKARIAIE & ZAKARIAIE 10100 Santa Monica Blvd., Suite 300 3 Los Angeles, CA 90067 Telephone: 310-552-0066 4 Facsimile: 310-552-4585 5 Attorneys for Plaintiff and Cross-Defendant 632 N Palm Drive, LLC 6 7 8 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA 9 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 10 632 N PALM DRIVE, LLC. CASE NO.: 19SMCV00434 11 Assigned to the Honorable Judge Elaine W. Plaintiff, Mandel, Dept. P 12 v. RESPONSE TO GOLD PACIFIC’S 13 OBJECTION TO PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE GOLD PACIFIC CONSTRUCTION, OF RULING 14 INC., a California corporation, ADAN PENA, an individual; SURETEC Date: March 9, 2021 15 INDEMNITY COMPANY, a California Time: 8:30 am. corporation, and DOES 1-20 16 Dept.: “P” Defendants. 17 18 _________________________________ AND ALL CROSS-RELATED ACTIONS 19 20 TO ALL PARTIES, and to their ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: 21 Plaintiff 632 N Palm Drive LLC (“Palm”) hereby responds to Gold Pacific’s Objection 22 to Plaintiff’s Notice of Ruling dated March 11, 2021 and Declaration of Sean Reynolds in 23 support thereof. 24 At the outset, it should be noted that the Objection and Declaration are replete with false 25 statements with the intention to create a fictional and false record, as is Mr. Reynolds’ practice 26 and custom, which has not only been chastised by the Court repeatedly, but for which Mr. 27 Reynolds’ has been monetarily and non-monetarily sanctioned including but not limited to an 28 order for Mr. Reynolds to attend a 4 hour ethics/civility MCLE course . In other words, Mr. ZAKARIAIE & -1- ZAKARIAIE PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO OBJECTIONS TO NOTICE OF RULING