arrow left
arrow right
  • 632 N PALM DRIVE, LLC VS ADAN PENA, ET AL. Contractual Fraud (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • 632 N PALM DRIVE, LLC VS ADAN PENA, ET AL. Contractual Fraud (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES Civil Division West District, Santa Monica Courthouse, Department P 19SMCV00434 July 6, 2021 632 N PALM DRIVE, LLC vs ADAN PENA, et al. 10:30 AM Judge: Honorable Elaine W. Mandel CSR: None Judicial Assistant: P. Anyankor ERM: None Courtroom Assistant: R. Juarez Deputy Sheriff: None APPEARANCES: For Plaintiff(s): Nilou A Zakariaie (Telephonic) For Defendant(s): Theresa L. Mallen is appearing telephonically for Daniel A Crespo; Jeffrey Horowitz (Telephonic); Sean Reynolds (Telephonic) NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS: Informal Discovery Conference (IDC); Case Management Conference; Informal Discovery Conference (IDC) (Requested by Plaintiff, 632 N. Palm Drive) The matters are called for hearing. Case Management Conference is held. Attorneys' Jeffrey Horowitz and Sean Reynolds are ordered to meet and confer (remotely is acceptable) re: discovery issues. Case Management Conference is continued to 09/24/2021 at 09:00 AM in Department P at Santa Monica Courthouse. Notice is waived. Informal Discovery Conferences are held and complete. The Court orders Plaintiff, 632 N. Palm Drive, LLC and Cross-Complainant, Gold Pacific Construction, Inc. to a Discovery Referee. Said parties are ordered to split the Discovery Referee costs, fifty-fifty. If the Discovery Referee finds that a party is acting in bad faith, under his or her discretion, the Referee may recommend a change in allocation of costs for discovery, in a manner other than a fifty-fifty split. The Court will be inclined to accept the recommendations of the Referee. Minute Order Page 1 of 2