arrow left
arrow right
  • JANE DOE VS TIMOTHY P WHITE Writ - Administrative Mandamus (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • JANE DOE VS TIMOTHY P WHITE Writ - Administrative Mandamus (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 03/25/2019 02:38 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by S. Bolden,Deputy Clerk FEE EXEMPT- GOV'T CODE§ 6103 1 CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL 2 Katherine A. Winder (SBN 24 7831) William C. Hsu (SBN 108922) 3 401 Golden Shore, 3rd Floor Long Beach, CA 90802-4210 4 Telephone: (562) 951-4500 Facsimile: (562) 951-4956 5 Email: kwinder@calstate.edu 6 Attorneys for Respondents Board of Trustees of the California State University and Timothy P. White 7 8 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 9 FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CENTRAL DISTRICT 10 11 JANE DOE, an individual, Case No. 19STCP00104 12 Petitioner, Dept: 82 Judge: Honorable Mary H. Strobel 13 vs. RESPONDENTS' ANSWER TO PETITION FOR 14 TIMOTHY P. WHITE, an individual in his WRIT OF MANDATE AND DECLARATORY official capacity as Chancellor of the RELIEF 15 California State University, THE TRU STEES OF THE CALIFORNIA Date of Filing: January 22, 2019 16 STATE UNIVERSITY, a California Trial Date: None Set corporation, and DOES 1 to 20 inclusive 17 Respondents. 18 19 20 Respondents Board of Trustees of the California State University, which is the State of California 21 acting in its higher education capacity (erroneously sued as "The Trustees of the California State 22 University"), and Timothy P. White, sued in his official capacity as Chancellor of the California State 23 University, (collectively, "CSU"), hereby answer Petitioner Jane Doe's Petition for Writ of Mandate and 24 Declaratory Relief as follows: 25 26 Petitioner's Introduction: With respect to Petitioner's Introduction, CSU admits that Petitioner 27 Jane Doe was a former graduate professor at CSU's Fresno campus ("Fresno"). CSU admits that this is 28 a mandamus action brought by Petitioner and that a Title IX investigation concerning Petitioner has been -1- RESPONDENTS' ANSWER TO PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDATE AND DECLARATORY RELIEF