arrow left
arrow right
  • JANE DOE VS TIMOTHY P WHITE Writ - Administrative Mandamus (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • JANE DOE VS TIMOTHY P WHITE Writ - Administrative Mandamus (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES Civil Division Central District, Stanley Mosk Courthouse, Department 82 19STCP00104 May 2, 2019 JANE DOE vs TIMOTHY P WHITE 1:30 PM Judge: Honorable Mary H. Strobel CSR: M Burris/CSR 8424 Judicial Assistant: N DiGiambattista ERM: None Courtroom Assistant: B Hall Deputy Sheriff: None APPEARANCES: For Petitioner(s): Mark McClellan Hathaway (x) For Respondent(s): William Casey Hsu (x) Other Appearance Notes: BY COURT CALL: Kristina Supler and Susan Stone (x) NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS: MOTION OF PETITIONER, JANE DOE, TO HAVE KRISTINA W. SUPLER APPEAR AS COUNSEL PRO HAC VICE FOR PETITIONER JANE DOE; . MOTION OF ABOVE PETITIONER TO HAVE SUSAN STONE APPEAR AS COUNSEL PRO HAC VICE FOR PETITIONER JANE DOE; . TRIAL SETTING CONFERENCE Matters come on for hearing. With regard to the applications to appear pro hac vice, the court adopts its tentative ruling as the order of the court as is set forth in this minute order. Petitioner Jane Doe (“Petitioner”) moves for pro hac vice admission of Attorney Kristina W. Supler as counsel for Petitioner in this action. Procedural History On January 22, 2019, Petitioner filed a petition for writ of mandate. Respondents filed an answer on March 25, 2019. On April 3, 2019, Petitioner filed and served her pro hac vice application. No opposition has been received. Analysis “A person who is not a member of the State Bar of California but who is a member in good standing of and eligible to practice before the bar of any United States court or the highest court Minute Order Page 1 of 3