arrow left
arrow right
  • CAVALRY SPV I, LLC, AS ASSIGNEE OF CITIBANK, N.A., VS RAYMOND V LIEU Collections Case - Purchased Debt (Charged Off Consumer Debt Purchased on or after January 1,2014) (Limited Jurisdiction) document preview
  • CAVALRY SPV I, LLC, AS ASSIGNEE OF CITIBANK, N.A., VS RAYMOND V LIEU Collections Case - Purchased Debt (Charged Off Consumer Debt Purchased on or after January 1,2014) (Limited Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

ATTORNEY ORPARTYWlTHOUTATTORNEY {Name andAddress) Winn Law Grou A EMC Brian N. Winn (St-3N 86779) Laura M. Hoalst (SEN 101082) Eacky 12. Wang (SEN FORCOURTUSEONLY 222464) Jason M. Burrows (SEE: 309882} 1‘10 E WILSHIRE AVE STE. 212, FULLERTON CA 92832 TELEPHONE NO.:(7I4) 446-6686 FA): No. (714) 445a5680 FILE NO: 18m15478LO~JPSmDGR (1910~00 20952068) ATTORNEY FOR (Name): PLAINTIFF SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES STREET ADDRESS: SUPERIOR COURT1 OF CALIFORNIA 12720 NORWALK BLVD. MAILING ADDRESS: SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA 12720 NORWALK BLVD. CITY AND ZIP CODE: NORWALK CA 90650 BRANCH NAME}: SOUTHEAST DISTRICT, LIMITED PLAINTEFF: CAVALRY SPV I, LLC, as assignee of CITIBANK, N.A. , DEFENDANT: RAYMOND v LIEU, et al. JUDGMENT CASE NUMBER: [ ] :y glerk [XX] Boy [getaultu [ ] 3ft? Court “that:| IBMWLCOWIQ I 3 V w" I 1 ” “p“ ““3" I 1 99mm”? °t RESERVATION #272037082361 Appear at Trlal JUDGMENT ‘l.[ ] BY DEFAULT a. Defendant was properly served with a copy of the summons and complaint. . Defendant failed to answer the complaint or appear and defend the action within the time atlowed by law. [100' . Defendant's defautt was entered by the cierk upon plaintiff's application. . [ jClerk's Judgment (Code Civ. Proc, § 585(3)). Defendant was sued only on a contract orjudgment of a court of this state for the recovery of money. e. [ E Court Judgment (Code Civ. Prod, § 58503)). The court considered (1) 1 } ptaintifi’s testimony and other evidence. (2) [ } plaintiffs written declaration (Code Civ. Proc, § 585(d)). 2. [XX] ON STIPULATION 3. Plaintiff and defendant agreed (stiputated) that a judgment be entered in this case. The court approved the stipulated Electronically Received 03/29/2021 09:12 AM judgment and b. [X] the signed written stipulation was filed in the case. (2. [ ] the stipulation was stated in open court [ j the stipulation was stated on the record 3. [ ] AFTER COURT TRIAL. The jury was waived. The court considered the evidence. a. The case was tried on (date and time): before (name ofjudicial officer): b. Appearances by: i 1 Plaintiff (name each): [ ] Plaintiff's attorney (name each): (1) (1) (2) (2) i } Continued on Attachment 3b. [ } Defendant (name each): [ ] Defendant's attorney (name each): (1) (1) (2) (2) [ ] Continued on Attachment 3b. c. E ] Defendant did not appear at trial. Defendant was propely served with notice of trial. d. [ ]A statement of decision (Code ofCiv. Proc, § 532) [ jwas not [ ]was requested. Page 1 of2 Form Approved for Optional Use Code of Ciwl Procedure. §§ 585, 664 s Judiciai Council of California JUDGMENT JUD-IDG (New January 1. 2002)