Party Discovery: David Ridge vs. The California Highway Patrol

• 
• 
• 
• 

						
                                
Preview
                                CASE NUMBER: 34-2019-00265393                                                             DEPARTMENT: 53
CASE TITLE: Ridge vs. CA Highway Patrol
PROCEEDINGS: Ex Parte Appiication for Order Rescheduling Hearings

                                     SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
                                        COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO



DATE/TIME         : November 10,2022                                   DEPT. NO      : 53
JUDGE             : Richard K. Sueyoshi                                CLERK         : T. Morgan
REPORTER          : None                                               BAILIFF       : None


DAVID RIDGE, an individual,
                                                                       Case No.: 34-2019-00265393
        Plaintiff,

V.

THE CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL;
DOES 1 to 100, inclusive.

        Defendants.

NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS:                   Ex Parte Application for Order Rescheduling Hearings on Plaintiffs
                                         Motion for Protective Order and Defendant's Motions to Compel

The Court rules on this matter without hearing. Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 166(a)(1); Sac. Sup. Ct. Local Rule
2.35(A); see also Wilburn v. Oakland Hospital (1989) 213 CaI.App.3d 1107, 1111. The Court has reviewed the
ex parte application and its supporting papers. No opposition was filed.

Plaintiffhas filed an ex parte application to advance the hearing date on its motion for protective order,
currently set for January 11, 2023, and also to modify this Court's prior orders which granted Defendant's ex
parte applications and reserved hearings on shortened time for Defendant's two discovery motions (one of
which is related to Plaintiffs motion for protective order) for November 23, 2022. Plaintiff seeks all three
motions to be heard on or after November 30, 2022, and a briefmg schedule regarding the same.

The Court GRANTS the application in part as follows: (1) the hearing on Plaintiffs motion for protective order
shall be advanced to December 1. 2022, at 1:30 p.m., in Department 53: (2) any opposing papers shall be filed
and served by November 16, 2022: (4) any reply papers shall be filed and served by November 22, 2022. All
filings shall be made in Department 53. Service shall be electronically or by hand.

Additionally, the Court hereby MODIFIES its November 4, 2022 orders on Defendant's ex parte applications
(ROA 116, 118) as follows: (1) the hearings on Defendant's two motions shall be continued to December 1,
2022, at 1:30 p.m., in Department 53; (2) any opposing papers shall be filed and served by November 16,
2022; (3) any reply papers shall be filed and served by November 22, 2022. Allfilingsshall be made in
Department 53. Service shall be electronically or by hand.

Plaintiff shall serve a copy of this order on all parties forthwith.

Certificate ofService by Mailing attached.
CASE NUMBER: 34-2019-00265393                                                              DEPARTMENT: 53
CASE TITLE: Ridge vs. CA Highway Patrol
PROCEEDINGS: Ex Parte Application for Order Rescheduling Hearings



                             CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE BY MAILING

        I, the Clerk of the Superior Court of Califomia, County of Sacramento, certify that I am not a party to
this cause, and on the date shown below I served the foregoing MINUTE ORDER by sending true copies
thereof, addressed respecfively to the persons addresses shown below:

James F. Curran                                          John P. Briscoe
Deputy Attomey General                                   Mayall Hurley P.C.
P.O. Box 944255                                          2453 Grand Canal Boulevard
Sacramento, CA 94244                                     Stockton, CA 95207

Email: James.Curran(2)do).ca.gov                         Email: ibriscoe(a),mavallaw.com



       I, the undersigned Deputy Clerk, declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is tme and correct.


       Dated: November 10, 2022
                                                         By: T. Morgan,\Deputy Clerk

                                                         Superior Court ofCalifornia,
                                                         County of Sacramento