arrow left
arrow right
  • David Ridge vs. The California Highway Patrol Unlimited Civil document preview
  • David Ridge vs. The California Highway Patrol Unlimited Civil document preview
  • David Ridge vs. The California Highway Patrol Unlimited Civil document preview
  • David Ridge vs. The California Highway Patrol Unlimited Civil document preview
  • David Ridge vs. The California Highway Patrol Unlimited Civil document preview
  • David Ridge vs. The California Highway Patrol Unlimited Civil document preview
						
                                

Preview

1 ROB BONTA Attorney General of California 2 KRISTIN M . DAILY Supervising Deputy Attorney General 3 JAMES F. CURRAN Deputy Attorney General 4 State Bar No. 142041 1300 I Street, Suite 125 5 P.O. Box 944255 Sacramento, CA 94244-2550 6 Telephone: (916)210-6113 Fax: (916)324-5567 7 E-mail: James.Curran@doj.ca.gov Attorneys for Defendant 8 California Highway Patrol 9 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 10 COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO 12 13 DAVID RIDGE, Case No. 34-2019-00265393 14 Plaintiff, [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER RE 15 DISCLOSURE OF PEACE OFFICER PERSONNEL RECORDS 16 Date: July 20, 2022 17 THE CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL; Time: 1:30 p.m. and DOES 1-100, inclusive. Dept: 53 18 Judge: Hon. Richard K. Sueyoshi Defendants. Trial Date: April 3, 2023 19 Action Filed: September 23, 2019 20 21 Defendant David Ridge's "Motion for Discovery Pursuant to penal Code Section 832.7 and 22 Evidence Code Section 1043" (Pitchess) came before this Court on July 20, 2022, at 23 approximately 1:30 p.m. in Department 53. 24 This Court, having ordered disclosure of the records and other information enumerated in 25 its Order for Discovery Pursuant to Evidence Code Section 1043, issues the following protective 26 order: 27 28 1 [Proposed] Protective Order Re Disclosure of Peace Officer Personnel Records (34-2019-00265393) 1 1. No information disclosed pursuant to this Court's order shall be used to oppress, 2 embarrass, or annoy the California Highway Patrol (CHP) officers whose records were the 3 subject of this motion. 4 2. The information ordered disclosed pursuant to this Court's order shall be used for no 5 purpose other than to contact the officers whose records this Cbiirt has ordered disclosed to ask 6 those officers the following questions: 7 8 9 10 11 12 3. In no event shall the information ordered disclosed pursuant to this Court's order be 13 used for any purpose other than a court proceeding pursuant to applicable law; and 14 4. Upon conclusion of the instant action, the original documents and all photocopies of 15 the records and information disclosed pursuant to this Court's order shall be returned to the Office 16 of the Attorney General, attention: Deputy Attorney General James F. Curran, 1300 I Street, 17 Sacramento, CA 95814. 18 DATED: / /2022 19 JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT 20 21 SA2019106238 3627791 l.docx 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [Proposed] Protective Order Re Disclosure of Peace Officer Personnel Records (34-2019-00265393) DECLARATION OF SERVICE BY E-MAIL Case Name: David Ridge v. CHP No.: 34-2019-00265393 I declare: 1 am employed in the Office of the Attorney General, which is the office of a member of the California State Bar, at which member's direction this service is made. 1 am 18 years of age or older and not a party to this matter. 1 am familiar with the business practice at the Office of the Attorney General for collection and processing of correspondence for mailing with the United States Postal Service. In accordance with that practice, correspondence placed in the internal mail collection system at the Office of the Attorney General is deposited with the United States Postal Service with postage thereon fully prepaid that same day in the ordinary course of business. On July 7, 2022,1 served the attached [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER RE DISCLOSURE OF PEACE OFFICER PERSONNEL RECORDS by transmitting a true copy via electronic mail addressed as follows: John P. Briscoe Mayall Hurley P.C. E-mail Address: ibriscoe@mavallaw.com ]riley@,mavallaw.com I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California and the United States of America the foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration was executed on Jj^iy 7, 2022, at Sacramento, California. Christopher R. Irby Declarant SA20I9I06238 36345366.docx