On October 26, 2016 a
Stipulation,Agreement
was filed
involving a dispute between
Sacramento Casino Royale Llc,
and
Does 1-100,
Parker, Port J.,
Radoslovich Parker Turner Pc,
for (Other Professional Malpractic...)
in the District Court of Sacramento County.
Preview
1 Patrick J. Becherer (Bar No. 50090)
pbecherer@bkscal.com j y k. i M ^ ' i'i ^ i-*'
2 Alex P. Catalona (Bar No. 200901)
acatalona@bkscal.com
3 BHC LAW GROUP LLP
5900 Hollis St., Suite O JUN 1 7 2020
4 Emeryville, CA 94608
(510) 658-3600 Telephone By: p. J0HNgjN:MEi-'-ADO
5 (510) 658-1151 Facsimile DEPUTY GI.EHK
6 Attomeys for Defendants
PORT J. PARKER and RADOSLOVICH,
7 PARKER, TURNER, P.C.
8
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNM.
9
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO
10
11 SACRAMENTO CASINO ROYALE, Case No. 34-2016-00202398
LLC,
12 STIPULATION AND QPRGPeSfiBT ORDER RE
Plaintiff, ENFORCEMENT OP SETTLEMENT
13 AGREEMENT UNDER CODE OF CIVIL
V. PROCEDURE SECTION 664.6 AND
14 DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
PORT J. PARKER; RADOSLOVICH,
15 PARKER, TURNER, P.C; and DOES 1
through 100, inclusive
16
Defendants.
17
18 Plaintiff Sacramento Casino Royale, LLC ("Plaintiff) and Defendants Port J. Parker and
19 Radoslovich, Parker, Turner, P.C. ("Defendants") hereby stipulate as follows:
20 1. On orabout October26,2016, Plaintiff filed a Coirplaint for Damages ("Action").
21 2. On or about September 21, 2017, Defendants filed a Petition to Compel Arbitration in
22 lieu of an Answer. Thatpetition was granted on November 15, 2017.
23 3. The Parties have since settled the Action.
24 4. Pursuant to section 5, paragraph J of the Settlement Agreement, the Parties agree
25 the Court shall retain jurisdiction over the Parties, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section
26 664.6, to enforce the terms of the Settlement.
27 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and among the Parties, through counsel for the parties,
28 pursuant to the parties' settlement agreement and based on the parties' express authorization.
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Pursuant to CCP § 664.6
1
consent and knowledge as follows:
1
1. The entire action shall be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to the Settlement
2
Agreement, subject to the Court's agreement to retain jurisdiction pursuant to Code
3
of Civil Procedure section 664.6; and
4
2. The court shall retain jurisdiction, under Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6,
5
6 to enforce the terms of the Settlement Agreement.
.7
PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL MAST ;PT,A.P.C.
8
9 Dated:
Kenneth E.Tiacon,
10 on behalf of Plaintiff SACRAMENTO
CASINO ROYALE, LLC
11
12 DEFENDANTS' COUNSEL BHC LAW GROUP LLP
13
Dated:
14 Alex P. Catalona
15 on behalf of Defendants Port J. Parker and
Radoslovich, Parker, Turner, P.C. LLC
16
17 ORDiER
18 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
19 1. The Court, having reviewed the Stipulation of the Parties, by and through their
20 authorized counsel, and being familiar with the record of this case, dismisses this action in its
21 entirety with prejudice; and
22 2. Pursuant to Code of CivilProcedure section 664.6 and any other relevant statutory
23 provisions, and the Parties' Stipulation and Settlement Agreement, this Court retams jurisdiction over
24 this action and over the Parties personally for such fiirther orders, hearings, and other proceedings as
25 may be appropriate to enforce the terms ofthe Stipulation and Settlement Agreement
26
n IS SO ORDERED:
27
28
DATED ^ - I "7 - r
JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOEJEOURT
CHRISTOPHER E. KRUEGER
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Pursuant to CCP § 664.6
2
Document Filed Date
June 17, 2020
Case Filing Date
October 26, 2016
Category
(Other Professional Malpractic...)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
1 Patrick J. Becherer (Bar No. 50090) pbecherer@bkscal.com j y k. i M ^ ' i'i ^ i-*' 2 Alex P. Catalona (Bar No. 200901) acatalona@bkscal.com 3 BHC LAW GROUP LLP 5900 Hollis St., Suite O JUN 1 7 2020 4 Emeryville, CA 94608 (510) 658-3600 Telephone By: p. J0HNgjN:MEi-'-ADO 5 (510) 658-1151 Facsimile DEPUTY GI.EHK 6 Attomeys for Defendants PORT J. PARKER and RADOSLOVICH, 7 PARKER, TURNER, P.C. 8 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNM. 9 COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO 10 11 SACRAMENTO CASINO ROYALE, Case No. 34-2016-00202398 LLC, 12 STIPULATION AND QPRGPeSfiBT ORDER RE Plaintiff, ENFORCEMENT OP SETTLEMENT 13 AGREEMENT UNDER CODE OF CIVIL V. PROCEDURE SECTION 664.6 AND 14 DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE PORT J. PARKER; RADOSLOVICH, 15 PARKER, TURNER, P.C; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive 16 Defendants. 17 18 Plaintiff Sacramento Casino Royale, LLC ("Plaintiff) and Defendants Port J. Parker and 19 Radoslovich, Parker, Turner, P.C. ("Defendants") hereby stipulate as follows: 20 1. On orabout October26,2016, Plaintiff filed a Coirplaint for Damages ("Action"). 21 2. On or about September 21, 2017, Defendants filed a Petition to Compel Arbitration in 22 lieu of an Answer. Thatpetition was granted on November 15, 2017. 23 3. The Parties have since settled the Action. 24 4. Pursuant to section 5, paragraph J of the Settlement Agreement, the Parties agree 25 the Court shall retain jurisdiction over the Parties, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 26 664.6, to enforce the terms of the Settlement. 27 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and among the Parties, through counsel for the parties, 28 pursuant to the parties' settlement agreement and based on the parties' express authorization. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Pursuant to CCP § 664.6 1 consent and knowledge as follows: 1 1. The entire action shall be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to the Settlement 2 Agreement, subject to the Court's agreement to retain jurisdiction pursuant to Code 3 of Civil Procedure section 664.6; and 4 2. The court shall retain jurisdiction, under Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6, 5 6 to enforce the terms of the Settlement Agreement. .7 PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL MAST ;PT,A.P.C. 8 9 Dated: Kenneth E.Tiacon, 10 on behalf of Plaintiff SACRAMENTO CASINO ROYALE, LLC 11 12 DEFENDANTS' COUNSEL BHC LAW GROUP LLP 13 Dated: 14 Alex P. Catalona 15 on behalf of Defendants Port J. Parker and Radoslovich, Parker, Turner, P.C. LLC 16 17 ORDiER 18 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 19 1. The Court, having reviewed the Stipulation of the Parties, by and through their 20 authorized counsel, and being familiar with the record of this case, dismisses this action in its 21 entirety with prejudice; and 22 2. Pursuant to Code of CivilProcedure section 664.6 and any other relevant statutory 23 provisions, and the Parties' Stipulation and Settlement Agreement, this Court retams jurisdiction over 24 this action and over the Parties personally for such fiirther orders, hearings, and other proceedings as 25 may be appropriate to enforce the terms ofthe Stipulation and Settlement Agreement 26 n IS SO ORDERED: 27 28 DATED ^ - I "7 - r JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOEJEOURT CHRISTOPHER E. KRUEGER STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Pursuant to CCP § 664.6 2