On October 08, 2019 a
Party Notice
was filed
involving a dispute between
Acosta, Sandy,
Jetcruzer International, Llc.,
and
Acosta, Sandy,
Does 3 Through 50,
Guzman, Marvin J.,
Zepeda, Ulises A.,
for Fraud
in the District Court of San Bernardino County.
Preview
CM 015
ATTpRNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY Name Stete Bar number and address FOR COURT USE ONLY
Angelica A Samaniego SBN 235423
VARNER BRANDT LLP i r
su tr a9 r r r t r
3750 University 6th Flflor
c
U v r t
t t to
Riverside CA 92501 s f ti i rt r
TEI EPHONE NO 9S 1 Z IA 7777 FAX N4 OpBonaQ 9S 274 I77O
E MAi ADDRESS OpfionsJj U t4 L
A770RNEY FOR Name JETCRUZER
f
SUPERtOR COURT OF GAI IFdRN1A couN nr oF SAN BERNARDINO
STREETADDRESS 274 W St TI11I CI StTE Et 7 Y
MAt NG ADOF2ESS
CITYANDZIPCODE 5 11 BeTT1aTd1T1O CA
BRANCH NAME SOUtI1W St
case NunnseR
PLAINTIFF PE7ITIONER JETCRUZER
CIVDS 1930132
DEFENDANT RESPpNDENT SANDY ACOSTA JUDICIAI OFFICER
Thomas S Garza
DEPT
NOTICE OF REL ATED CASE s 27
ldenfify in chronalogica order according to dafe of friing al cases relafed to the case referenced above
a Titie Acosta v Aerospace
b Case number SMCFS 1906531
c Court same as above
other state or federal court name and address
d Department Fontana F4
e Case type limited civil uNimited civii probate famiiy law other specify Small Claims
f Filing date 9 2Q 2019
g Has this case been designated or determined as complex Yes 0 No
h Relationship of this case to the case referenced above chsck a thaf apply
L involves the same parties and is based on the same or similar claims
O arises from the same or substantially iden ical transactians incidents or events requiring the determination af
the same or substantially identical questians of law or fact
involves claims against title to passession of ar damages to the same property
is likely for other reasons ta require substantial duplication of judicial resources if heard by differen judges
Additional explanation is attached in attachment 1h
i Status af case
0 pending
0 dismissed with withaut prejudice
disposed of by judgment
2 a Title
b Case number
a Court C same as above
other state ar federal court name and address
d Department
Page 1 of 3
Form Approved for Optional Use
NOTICE OF RELATED CASE Ca Rules of Court rule 3 3p0
Judicial Council of Cal rfomia
wwwcourtinfo ca gav
CAA 415 Rev July 1 2UQ7
I
CM 015
CASE NUMBER
Pl AINTIFF PET1710NER JETCRUZER
eIVI SI OI 2
DEFENDAN7 RESPONDENT SANDY ACOSTA
2 jcantinued
e Case type limited civil 0 unlimited civil probate family law other specify
f Filing date
g Has this case been designated ar de ermined as compiex Yes No
h Relationship of this case to the case referenced above cheak all that apply
invoCves the same parties and is based on the same ar similar claims
arises from the same or substantially identical transactions incidents or events requiring the determination of
the same or su6s antially identical questions af taw ar fact
involves claims against title to possession of ar damages ta the same property
is IikeEy for other reasans to require substantial duplication af judicial resources if heard by different judges
0 Additional explanation is attached in attachment 2h
i Status of case
pending
dismissed Cj with 0 without prejudice
dispased af by judgment
3 a Titls
b Case number
c Caurt same as abave
other state or federal court name and address
d Depa tment
e Case type limited civil unlimited civil probate family law 0 other specify
f Filing date
g Has this case been designated or determined as complex C Yes No
h Relationship of this case to the case referenced above check all fhaf app yj
invoives the same parties and is based pn the same or similar claims
0 arises from the same or substantially identical transactions incidents or events requiring the determinatian of
the same ar substantiaily identicai questions of law or fact
involves claims against title to passession of or damages to the same property
0 is likely far other reasans to require substantial duptication af judicial resaurces if heard by different judges
Additianal explanation is attached in attachment 3h
i Status a case
C pending
dismissed Q with without prejudice
disposed of by judgment
4 0 Additional related cases are described in Attachment 4 Number of pages attached
Date 11 S 19
Angelica A Sarnaniega
7 YPE OR Pft1NT NAME OF PARTY OR AT7CYRNEY S GhtA QF PARTY OR ATf6RNEY
CM 015 Rev July t 2007J Page 2 of 3
NOTICE OF RELATED CASE
Document Filed Date
November 07, 2019
Case Filing Date
October 08, 2019
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
CM 015 ATTpRNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY Name Stete Bar number and address FOR COURT USE ONLY Angelica A Samaniego SBN 235423 VARNER BRANDT LLP i r su tr a9 r r r t r 3750 University 6th Flflor c U v r t t t to Riverside CA 92501 s f ti i rt r TEI EPHONE NO 9S 1 Z IA 7777 FAX N4 OpBonaQ 9S 274 I77O E MAi ADDRESS OpfionsJj U t4 L A770RNEY FOR Name JETCRUZER f SUPERtOR COURT OF GAI IFdRN1A couN nr oF SAN BERNARDINO STREETADDRESS 274 W St TI11I CI StTE Et 7 Y MAt NG ADOF2ESS CITYANDZIPCODE 5 11 BeTT1aTd1T1O CA BRANCH NAME SOUtI1W St case NunnseR PLAINTIFF PE7ITIONER JETCRUZER CIVDS 1930132 DEFENDANT RESPpNDENT SANDY ACOSTA JUDICIAI OFFICER Thomas S Garza DEPT NOTICE OF REL ATED CASE s 27 ldenfify in chronalogica order according to dafe of friing al cases relafed to the case referenced above a Titie Acosta v Aerospace b Case number SMCFS 1906531 c Court same as above other state or federal court name and address d Department Fontana F4 e Case type limited civil uNimited civii probate famiiy law other specify Small Claims f Filing date 9 2Q 2019 g Has this case been designated or determined as complex Yes 0 No h Relationship of this case to the case referenced above chsck a thaf apply L involves the same parties and is based on the same or similar claims O arises from the same or substantially iden ical transactians incidents or events requiring the determination af the same or substantially identical questians of law or fact involves claims against title to passession of ar damages to the same property is likely for other reasons ta require substantial duplication of judicial resources if heard by differen judges Additional explanation is attached in attachment 1h i Status af case 0 pending 0 dismissed with withaut prejudice disposed of by judgment 2 a Title b Case number a Court C same as above other state ar federal court name and address d Department Page 1 of 3 Form Approved for Optional Use NOTICE OF RELATED CASE Ca Rules of Court rule 3 3p0 Judicial Council of Cal rfomia wwwcourtinfo ca gav CAA 415 Rev July 1 2UQ7 I CM 015 CASE NUMBER Pl AINTIFF PET1710NER JETCRUZER eIVI SI OI 2 DEFENDAN7 RESPONDENT SANDY ACOSTA 2 jcantinued e Case type limited civil 0 unlimited civil probate family law other specify f Filing date g Has this case been designated ar de ermined as compiex Yes No h Relationship of this case to the case referenced above cheak all that apply invoCves the same parties and is based on the same ar similar claims arises from the same or substantially identical transactions incidents or events requiring the determination of the same or su6s antially identical questions af taw ar fact involves claims against title to possession of ar damages ta the same property is IikeEy for other reasans to require substantial duplication af judicial resources if heard by different judges 0 Additional explanation is attached in attachment 2h i Status of case pending dismissed Cj with 0 without prejudice dispased af by judgment 3 a Titls b Case number c Caurt same as abave other state or federal court name and address d Depa tment e Case type limited civil unlimited civil probate family law 0 other specify f Filing date g Has this case been designated or determined as complex C Yes No h Relationship of this case to the case referenced above check all fhaf app yj invoives the same parties and is based pn the same or similar claims 0 arises from the same or substantially identical transactions incidents or events requiring the determinatian of the same ar substantiaily identicai questions of law or fact involves claims against title to passession of or damages to the same property 0 is likely far other reasans to require substantial duptication af judicial resaurces if heard by different judges Additianal explanation is attached in attachment 3h i Status a case C pending dismissed Q with without prejudice disposed of by judgment 4 0 Additional related cases are described in Attachment 4 Number of pages attached Date 11 S 19 Angelica A Sarnaniega 7 YPE OR Pft1NT NAME OF PARTY OR AT7CYRNEY S GhtA QF PARTY OR ATf6RNEY CM 015 Rev July t 2007J Page 2 of 3 NOTICE OF RELATED CASE