arrow left
arrow right
  • JETCRUZER -V- SANDY ACOSTA Print Fraud Unlimited  document preview
  • JETCRUZER -V- SANDY ACOSTA Print Fraud Unlimited  document preview
  • JETCRUZER -V- SANDY ACOSTA Print Fraud Unlimited  document preview
  • JETCRUZER -V- SANDY ACOSTA Print Fraud Unlimited  document preview
						
                                

Preview

From Law Office 1 310 382 2092 Sat Jul 11 00 51 01 2020 PDT Page 8 of 17 S 1 David M Shaby II Esq 97871 OUN Y O SAN SAN R RNARDINQ DISTRICT dshaby@shabyandassociates com 2 R Christopher Harshman Esq 248214 charshman a shabyandassociates com L Z 3 DAVID M SHABY II 8L ASSOCIATESr APC 11949 Jefferson Boulevard Suite 104 Y 4 Culver City California 90230 AN7M NY R71NEZ EPUTY Telephone 310 827 7171 5 Facsimile 310 822 8529 6 AttorneysforDefendant and Cross Complainant Sandy Acosta 7 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA 9 COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO 10 Jetcruzer International LLC Case no CIVDS1930132 11 Assigned to the Hon Tom Garza Dept S27 Plaintiff OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO COMPEL ANSWERS 12 S TO FORM INTERROGATORIES 13 Sandy Acosta et al Declaration ofR ChristopherHarshman filed 14 concurrently herewith Defendants Date July 23 2020 15 And Related Cross Complaint Time 10 00 a m Department S27 16 Complaint filed October S 2019 17 Trial date TBD 1S Defendant and cross complainant Sandy Acosta Acosta hereby opposes the motion to 19 compel answers to form interrogatories brought by plaintiffand cross defendantJetcruzer International Z LLC Plaintiff 21 I STATEMENT OF FACTS 22 The discovery requests at issue in this motion were served one day after California Governor 23 Newsom proclaimed a state ofemergency due to the global pandemic Declaration of R Christopher 24 Harshman Harshman Decl filed concurrently herewith 2 3 The responses were received by 25 Ms Acosta s counsel s office while it was scrambling to transition to a work from home situation 26 Id David M 4 8 Shaby II Associates APC is a tiny understaffed law firm ill equipped to 27 weather the unprecedented demands it COVID 19 Id placed on by the current pandemic 8 All of 28 1 OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO COMPFL ANSWERS TO FORM INTERROGATORIES From Law Office 1 310 382 2092 Sat 7u1 11 00 51 01 2020 PDT Page 9 of 17 1 that notwithstanding counsel has been working diligently with Ms Acosta Id 9 and verified 2 responses without objections will have been received by Plaintiff s counselwell in advance of the 3 hearing on this motion Id 10 4 II 1 RGUMENT 5 As responses will have been served and received prior to the hearing on this motion it is moot as 6 to the requested relief to compel responses As to sanctions Ms Acosta asserts the COVID 19 7 pandemic and the widespread disruptions it has caused constitute circumstances that make the 8 imposition of a sanction unjust Cal Code Civ Proc 2030 290 c 9 III CONCLUSION 10 The Court must deny the motion as moot and given the circumstances decline to award 11 sanctions 12 Respectfully submitted 13 DAv n M SHASY II AssoclATEs y R 14 Date July 10 2020 y 15 hristopher Harshman Esq Attarneys for Defendant and Cross Complainant 16 Sandy Acosta Electronically signedpursuant to Cav Code 1d33 7 d 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 OPPOSI 1 lOIV 1 O MO 1 lOn 1 O COMPEL ANSWERS 1 O FORM INTERIZOGATORIES