On October 08, 2019 a
Motion-Secondary
was filed
involving a dispute between
Acosta, Sandy,
Jetcruzer International, Llc.,
and
Acosta, Sandy,
Does 3 Through 50,
Guzman, Marvin J.,
Zepeda, Ulises A.,
for Fraud
in the District Court of San Bernardino County.
Preview
v xv-,
Angelica Acosta Samaniego, SBN 235423 t F l L En
VARNER & BRANDT LLP vg'gfimfi 331,355 Eggmonm
3750 University Avenue, Suite 610 SAN BERNARf-S’Né. Diigwéfio
Riverside, California 92501
AWN
NOV 03 2621
Telephone: (95 1) 274-7777
Facsimile: (95 1) 274—7770
Attorneys for Plaintiff,
JETCRUZER INTERNATIONAL, LLC.
\OOOVONUI
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
10
JETCRUZER INTERNATIONAL, LLC. Case No.: CIVDSl930132
610
11
Suite 92501
12
Plaintiffs, PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITION T0
LLP
DEFENDANT’S DEMURRER AND MOTION
V
13
'
T0 STRIKE
Avenue,
Brandt
California
274-7777
SANDY ACOSTA, an individual and DBA
14 CHINO AIRCRAFT INTERIORS &
85 l
‘
/ I 7 rz’
(951)
PAINT and CHINO AIRCRAFT I ‘
15
Varner
University
INTERIORS / CAI, and DOES 1 through
50, inclusive,
Riverside,
GS'IH
16
3750
17
AH
18
V3
19 COMES NOW PLAINTIFF, JETCRUZER INTERNATIONAL, LLC, and submits the
20 following in opposition to Defendant’s Demurrer and Motion to Strike:
21 I. FACTS
22 This lawsuit arises from an alleged breach of contract, tortious misrepresentation,
23 conversion of property, alleged interference with contractual relations, and alleged Violations of
24 Business & Professions Code 17200. Plaintiff, JETCRUZER INTERNATIONAL, LLC
§
25 (“Plaintiff’ or JetCruzer”) initially filed its original Complaint on October 8, 2019, naming
26 Defendant SANDY ACOSTA (“ACOSTA”), along with 50 “DOE” defendants. ACOSTA filed a
27 timely answer, and after conducting initial discovery, Plaintiff learned the identity oftwo additional
28 defendants (ULISES A. ZEPEDA and MARVIN J. GUZMAN), and filed an amendment to the
_ 1 _
OPPOSITION TO DEMURRER AND MOTION TO STRIKE
.
'
'
‘
A
‘
\ \ /
Document Filed Date
November 03, 2021
Case Filing Date
October 08, 2019
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
v xv-, Angelica Acosta Samaniego, SBN 235423 t F l L En VARNER & BRANDT LLP vg'gfimfi 331,355 Eggmonm 3750 University Avenue, Suite 610 SAN BERNARf-S’Né. Diigwéfio Riverside, California 92501 AWN NOV 03 2621 Telephone: (95 1) 274-7777 Facsimile: (95 1) 274—7770 Attorneys for Plaintiff, JETCRUZER INTERNATIONAL, LLC. \OOOVONUI SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO 10 JETCRUZER INTERNATIONAL, LLC. Case No.: CIVDSl930132 610 11 Suite 92501 12 Plaintiffs, PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITION T0 LLP DEFENDANT’S DEMURRER AND MOTION V 13 ' T0 STRIKE Avenue, Brandt California 274-7777 SANDY ACOSTA, an individual and DBA 14 CHINO AIRCRAFT INTERIORS & 85 l ‘ / I 7 rz’ (951) PAINT and CHINO AIRCRAFT I ‘ 15 Varner University INTERIORS / CAI, and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Riverside, GS'IH 16 3750 17 AH 18 V3 19 COMES NOW PLAINTIFF, JETCRUZER INTERNATIONAL, LLC, and submits the 20 following in opposition to Defendant’s Demurrer and Motion to Strike: 21 I. FACTS 22 This lawsuit arises from an alleged breach of contract, tortious misrepresentation, 23 conversion of property, alleged interference with contractual relations, and alleged Violations of 24 Business & Professions Code 17200. Plaintiff, JETCRUZER INTERNATIONAL, LLC § 25 (“Plaintiff’ or JetCruzer”) initially filed its original Complaint on October 8, 2019, naming 26 Defendant SANDY ACOSTA (“ACOSTA”), along with 50 “DOE” defendants. ACOSTA filed a 27 timely answer, and after conducting initial discovery, Plaintiff learned the identity oftwo additional 28 defendants (ULISES A. ZEPEDA and MARVIN J. GUZMAN), and filed an amendment to the _ 1 _ OPPOSITION TO DEMURRER AND MOTION TO STRIKE . ' ' ‘ A ‘ \ \ /