On October 08, 2019 a
Motion-Secondary
was filed
involving a dispute between
Acosta, Sandy,
Jetcruzer International, Llc.,
and
Acosta, Sandy,
Does 3 Through 50,
Guzman, Marvin J.,
Zepeda, Ulises A.,
for Fraud
in the District Court of San Bernardino County.
Preview
From Law Office 1.310.822.8529 Mon Jun 7 18:50:41 2071 PDT Page 2 of 6
~Y
David M. Shaby II, Esq. (97871) SUPERIOR COUR
dshaby@shabyandassociates.com T OF CG, -ALI
FORNIA
R. Christopher Harshman, Esq. (248214) SAN BERNARD \NING S| RNARDINO
DISTRICT
charshman@shabyandassociates.com
Davip M. Suasy II & AssociaTEs, APC JUN 8 2091
11949 Jefferson Boulevard, Suite 104
Culver City, California 90230 =
Telephone: 310) 827-7171 ee
S AMANTHA NEUBAUER
Facsimile: 310) 822-8529 , DEPUTY
Attorneys for Defendant and Cross-Complainant Sandy Acosta :
SUPERIOR CourRT OF CALIFORNIA
CouNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
10 Jetcruzer International, LLC, Case no, CIVDS1930132
n Plaintiff, Assigned to the Hon. Tom Garza, Dept. $27
12 RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S
JUNE 7, 2021
vs,
OBJECTION TO THE MAY 25, 2021
13 Sandy Acosta, et al, SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION OF R.
CHRISTOPHER HARSHMAN FILED IN SUPPORT
14 Defendants. OF DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL
FURTHER RESPONSES
15 And Related Cross-Complaint
Date: June 9, 2021
16 Time: 9:00 a.m.
V7
Department: $27
18
19 Defendant and cross-complainant Sandy Acosta (“ Acosta” or Defendant”) hereby responds
20 to the Objection to the Supplemental Declaration of R. Christopher Harshman Filed in Support of
21 Defendant’s Motion to Compel Further Responses (the “Objection”). The Objection was received by
22 Ms. Acosta’s counsel moments after it was sent via email at 5:29 p.m. on June 7, 2021. The
23 Supplemental Declaration in question was submitted, along with a Request to Submit Supplemental
24 Declaration, Under Seal, in Support of Motion to Compel Further Responses (the “Request”),
25 electronically to both the Court and counsel for plaintiff and cross-defendant JetCruzer International,
26 LLC (“JetCruzer” or “Plaintiff”), on May 25, 2021. JetCruzer makes this objection after the close of
27 business on June 7, 2021, leaving a single court day before the hearing on the instant Motion to Compel
28 Further Responses, despite JetCruzer’s counsel having not only been served with the Request and
1
RESPONSE TO OPPOSITION TO SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION
GOnWLSIG ONIGHYNH3E NYS
YINUOAIIVO 30 LUNOO HOIHdNS
12028 NOT
Gsaigzog
Document Filed Date
June 08, 2021
Case Filing Date
October 08, 2019
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.