arrow left
arrow right
  • MARGARITA  RAMOS VS JOHN  T.  HAYDEN, ET AL. Premise Liability (e.g., dangerous conditions of property, slip/trip and fall, dog attack, etc.) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • MARGARITA  RAMOS VS JOHN  T.  HAYDEN, ET AL. Premise Liability (e.g., dangerous conditions of property, slip/trip and fall, dog attack, etc.) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 05/18/2021 06:55 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by L. Coreas,Deputy Clerk 1 Gary A. Dordick, Esq. S/B# 128008 John M. Upton, Esq. S/B# 162858 2 Elizabeth A. Hernandez, Esq. S/B# 204322 3 DORDICK LAW CORPORATION 509 South Beverly Drive 4 Beverly Hills, California 90212 Tel: (310) 551-0949 • Fax: (855) 299-4444 5 Attorneys for Plaintiff Margarita Ramos 6 7 8 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 9 FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES – SPRING STREET COURTHOUSE 10 11 MARGARITA RAMOS, An Individual, Case No. 19STCV14556 (Assigned to: Hon. Daniel M. Crowley, Dept. 12 Plaintiff, 28) 13 v. PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITION TO 14 JOHN T. HAYDEN, an Individual; LB DEFENDANT SAMUEL KHACHERYAN PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, a Business DBA TRUE WORD & BRAD’S CARPET 15 Organization; and DOES 1 Through 30, CLEANING’S EX PARTE Inclusive, APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER 16 ADVANCING HEARING DATE; 17 Defendants. DECLARATION OF ELIZABETH A. HERNANDEZ IN SUPPORT 18 19 Date: May 19, 2021 Time: 8:30 a.m. 20 Dept: 28 ___________________________________ 21 Action Filed: April 25, 2019 AND RELATED CROSS-ACTIONS. 22 Trial Date: June 17, 2021 23 24 TO THE COURT AND ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: 25 Plaintiff Margarita Ramos (hereinafter, "Plaintiff") will and hereby does oppose 26 Defendant Samuel Khacheryan dba True Word & Brad’s Carpet Cleaning’s Ex Parte 27 Application for an order advancing the hearing date on Defendant Samuel Khacheryan 28 dba True Word & Brad’s Carpet Cleaning’s Motion to Vacate the Trial Preference Order 1. PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT KHACHERYAN ET AL.’S EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER ADVANCING HEARING DATE