Party Discovery: Jay Robinson vs. Asomeo Environmental Restoration Industry, L...

• 
• 
• 
• 

						
                                
Preview
                                ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY CName & Address):                                           FOR COURT USE ONLY
 Name: Shane Singh/Nolan W. Kessler         Bar No. 202733/327178
 street Address: 2020 West El Camino Avenue, Suite 700
 City: Sacramento                          state: CA      zip Code: 95833
 Telephone No.: 916.564.5400               Fax No. (Optional): 916.564.5444
 E-Mail Address (Optional): Shane.Singh@lewisbrisbois.eom                                 FILED/ENDORSED
 ATTORNEY FOR CA/ame;; Asomeo Environmental Restoration Industry
 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO                                                MAY 1 3 2020
 Gordon D. Schaber Courthouse
 720 9* Street                                                                           By:.         B. Sinoh
 Sacramento, Califomia 95814                                                                          Deputy Clerk


 PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Jay Robinson, et al.                                           CASE NUMBER:
                                                                                      34-2019-00262942-CU-OE-GDS
 DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Asomeo Environmental Restoration Industry

                                                                                      Judge:
          ATTORNEY/PARTY COMPLIANCE STATEMENT                                         Department: 31
                                                                                      Hearing Date: May 28, 2020

This Attorney/Party Compliance Statement must be completed and filed with the court at least 15 days before the
hearing. You must appear at the hearing in person or by telephone conference unless the court drops your matter. You
may access the court's website at www.saccourt.ca.qov after 2:00 p.m. the day before the hearing to learn whether the
Order to Show Cause (OSC) has been dropped from the courts calendar.        |

 1.      Explain why you failed to comply with the Case Management Progranri (CMP) rules as set forth in the OSC
         issued against you.                                                    |
        Defendant did not comply because Plaintiffs intend to file a Second Amended Complaint. Plaintiffs' counsel
        requested that Defendant postpone filing a response until after Plaintiffs file their Second Amended Complaint
2.       Have you now complied?
          • Yes. Describe how you have complied.


        S No. Describe when you intend to comply.
        Defendant will comply and file a responsive pleading after Plaintiffs files their Second Amended Complaint.

3.       Have all defendants been served?                                                                                                    CQ
         • Yes                 lEI No

        If not, why not?
        Defendant has not been served Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complairit,

4.       Have all named defendants answered or been defaulted?
         • Yes                M No

         If not, why not?
        Defendant has not answered because Plaintiffs' counsel requested that Defendant postpone filing a responsive
        pleading until after Plaintiffs file their Second Amended Complaint.
5.      Have you filed a Case Management Statement?
         K Yes                    • No.


 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct.

                                                                           Mav 13, 2020
(SIGNATURE OF ATTORNEY/PARTY)                                              (DATE)
Attorney For: Defendant                                          1
                                    ATTORNEY/PARTY COMPLIANCE STAl EMENT
CV\E-112 (Rev 10. 24.18)                                                                                        Page 1 of 1
Local Fonn Adopted for Mandatory Use                                                                   vmw. saccourt. ca. gov
                                                                                                        American LegaENet, Inc.       ff^n
                                                                                                        www.FonMWorkFlow.com      x j f v
                1                      CALIFORNIA STATE COURT PROOF OF SERVICE
                2               Jay Robinson, et al. v. Asomeo Environmental Restoration Industry, LLC -
                3                               Case No. 34-2019-00262942-C|U-OE-GDS
                4 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO
                5          At the time of service, I was over 18 years of age anjd not a party to the action. My
                    business address is 2020 West El Camino Avenue, Suite 700, Sacramento, CA 95833.
                6
                           On May 13, 2020,1 served the following document(s):
                7
                           ATTORNEY COMPLIANCE STATEMENT
                8
                        I served the documents on the following persons at the following addresses (including fax
                9 numbers and e-mail addresses, if applicable):
               10 Attornevs for Plaintiffs, Jay Robinson and
                  Huso Pineda
               11 Patricia A. Savage
               12 Savage,  Lamb & Lunde, PC
                  1550 Humboldt Road, Suite 4
                  Chico, CA 95928
               13 Phone: 530.592.3861
                  Fax: 530.592.3865
               14 Email: psavesq(ggmail.com
               15
               16          The documents were served by the following means:
               17
                    HI     (BY U.S. MAIL) I enclosed the documents in a sealed envelope or package addressed to
               18          the persons at the addresses listed above and:

               19 businesslEIpractices.
                                    Placed the envelope or package for collection and mailing, following our ordinary
                                         I am readily familiar with the firm's practice for collection and processing
                  correspondence     for mailing.  Under that practice, on the same day that correspondence is placed
               20 for collection and mailing, it is deposited in the ordinary course of business with the U.S. Postal
                  Service, in a sealed envelope or package with the postage fully prepaid.
               21
                          I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Califomia that the
               22 foregoing   is true and correct.
               23         Executed on May 13, 2020, at Sacramento, Califomia.
               24
               25
               26
               27
               28
LBA/IS
ER90IS
BSGAARD
&3VllfmP
ATTimBSATLAW