Preview
Fi i a
\ Fs | fn 5
\
= LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP Bi ee few anf
SHANE SINGH, SB# 202733
E-Mail: Shane.Singh@lewisbrisbois.com JUN 13 2023
NH
GRACE E. MEHTA, SB# 327676
E-Mail: Grace.Mehta@lewisbrisbois.com By: E Macdonald
OH
2020 West El Camino Avenue, Suite 700 y: Deputy ou
Sacramento, California 95833
ye
Telephone: 916.564.5400
Facsimile: 916.564.5444
Wm
Attorneys for Defendant, ASOMEO
DB
ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION
INDUSTRY, LLC
NA
Fe
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
So
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO
= SC
=O
JAY ROBINSON and HUGO PINEDA, CASE NO. 34-2019-00262942-CU-OE-GDS
NR
individually and on behalf of all others
FOO
similarly situated, DECLARATION OF GRACE MEHTA IN
oO
SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT’S
Plaintiffs, OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR CLASS
=F
»
BY FAX
CERTIFICATION
vs.
=F
ua
Date: June 27, 2023
ASOMEO ENVIRONMENTAL Time: 9:00 a.m.
F|F&
DBNAHeA
RESTORATION INDUSTRY, LLC, a Dept.: 54
California Corporation and PHILLIPS &
F§
JORDAN INC., a North Carolina Corporation | Action Filed: August 16, 2019
and DOES 1-10, Trial Date: None Set
F
Defendants.
CO
F&
CF
NR
DECLARATION OF GRACE MEHTA
=—=&=
NK
I, Grace Mehta, declare as follows:
NR
NY
L. I am an attorney duly admitted to practice in all of the courts of the State of
|}
NY
California and I am an associate with Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP, attorneys of record
+»
NY
for Defendant, ASOMEO ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION INDUSTRY, LLC herein. The
RY
a
facts set forth herein are of my own personal knowledge, and if sworn I could and would
Ne
IDB
competently testify thereto.
rv
2. In response to receiving Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification, Defendant AERI
Sa
LEWIS
nv
BRISBOIS 125565132.1 1
BISGAARD DECLARATION OF GRACE MEHTA IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT’S OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR
& SMITH LP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW CLASS CERTIFICATION
= noticed Plaintiff Pineda’s deposition. A true and correct copy of the Deposition Notice to Plaintiff
Pineda is attached hereto as Exhibit A.
Ne
ai Plaintiffs’ counsel responded to the deposition notice for Plaintiff Pineda via email
Oy
indicating that she would not be producing Plaintiff Pineda for deposition. A true and correct
>
copy of the email correspondence related to Plaintiff Pineda’s deposition is attached hereto as
Oe
Exhibit B.
NBD
4. Plaintiffs’ counsel took the deposition of Lawrence Kahn, AERI’s person most
knowledgeable, on April 21, 2022. A true and correct copy of the relevant portions of Mr. Kahn’s
fF
deposition transcript is attached hereto as Exhibit C.
So
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the
CO
foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration was executed on this 13th day of June, 2023,
=|
—
—=——
at Sacramento, California.
NY
==
HO
F&F
FF
Ace © AMax
F®
no
Grace E. Mehta /
Bo
FF
Fe
BN
FF
©
FS
NK
=
NK
NKR
NY
oO
NY
ss»
NY
aoa
NY
Dn
NY
rANIo
NY
LEWIS
So
nv
BRISBOIS 125565132.1 2
BISGAARD DECLARATION OF GRACE MEHTA IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT’S OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR
& SMITH LP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW CLASS CERTIFICATION
EXHIBIT A
= LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP
SHANE SINGH, SB# 202733
E-Mail: Shane.Singh@lewisbrisbois.com
NYO
GRACE E. MEHTA, SB# 327676
E-Mail: Grace.Mehta@lewisbrisbois.com
OW
2020 West El Camino Avenue, Suite 700
Sacramento, California 95833
>
Telephone: 916.564.5400
Facsimile: 916.564.5444
nD
Attorneys for Defendant, ASOMEO
Bn
ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION
INDUSTRY, LLC
NIN
fm
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
So
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO
mt
CS
mk
=
JAY ROBINSON and HUGO PINEDA, CASE NO. 34-2019-00262942-CU-OE-GDS
mk
NY
individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated,
He
mk
NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION OF
Plaintiffs, PLAINTIFF HUGO PINEDA
F&F
pm
vs.
Uo
mm
ASOMEO ENVIRONMENTAL Action Filed: August 16, 2019
ARAB
RESTORATION INDUSTRY, LLC, a Trial Date: None Set
California Corporation and PHILLIPS &
mm
BNH
JORDAN INC., a North Carolina Corporation
and DOES 1-10, ,
Defendants.
CO
FS
KCN
TO PLAINTIFF HUGO PINEDA AND HIS ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:
N
=
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 2025.010,
NY
NH
et seq., Defendant ASOMEO ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION INDUSTRY LLC
}}
NY
(“Defendant”) will take the deposition upon oral examination of Plaintiff HUGO PINEDA
F>_
NY
(“Plaintiff”) on June 13, 2023, at 10:30 a.m. (PST) at 2020 West El Camino Avenue, Suite 700
NY
a
Sacramento, California 95833.
Dn
NY
The deposition will be taken before a Notary Public or other person authorized to
IAI
NY
administer oaths pursuant to the laws of the State of California and shall continue from day to day,
Soa
LEWIS
nv
BRISBOIS
BISGAARD 93853045.1 ]
& SMITHLLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION OF PLAINTIFF HUGO PINEDA
= excluding Saturdays, Sundays, and holidays, until completed.
NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN, that pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section
NO
2025.220, the deposition may be video and/or audio taped. DEFENDANT also reserve the right
WD
to use said video and/or audio tapes at the time of trial.
Fe
If an interpreter will be necessary, please notify this office within five (5) days prior to the
nN
deposition and specify the language and dialect that will be required.
BD
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS
NIN
PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section
fF
2034.415 the deponent should provide a copy of all materials responsive to this notice at least
SoS
three (3) business days before the date of the deposition.
DHDelUmDNOGOlUlUreSEtlCCCOlCUCOlClUlCODWDOUCUCUNClCOCONOU
Nell
DEFINITIONS
—
——
“PLAINTIFF PINEDA” shall refer to Hugo Pineda and (i) all of his present and former
agents, representatives, accountants, investigators, and consultants; (ii) any other person or entity
=
kOe
acting on his behalf or on whose behalf he acted, or (iii) any other person or entity otherwise
F—=®
subject to his control or which controls him, or with which he is under common control.
FF?
“YOU” and “YOUR” shall refer to Hugo Pineda and (i) all of his present and former
F®
agents, representatives, accountants, investigators, and consultants; (ii) any other person or entity
F®
acting on his behalf or on whose behalf he acted, or (iii) any other person or entity otherwise
FF
subject to his control or which controls him, or with which he is under common control.
“PLAINTIFF ROBINSON” shall refer to Jay Robinson and (i) all of his present and
NY
former agents, representatives, accountants, investigators, and consultants; (ii) any other person or
NKR
entity acting on his behalf or on whose behalf he acted, or (iii) any other person or entity otherwise
NKR
subject to his control or which controls him, or with which he is under common control.
KR
“DEFENDANT AERI” shall refer to ASOMEO ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION
kt
KY
INDUSTRY, LLC and (i) all their present and former agents, representatives, accountants,
eUW
NY
investigators, consultants, and attorneys; (ii) any other person or entities acting on their behalf or
DNDN
NY
on whose behalf they acted; or (iii) any other person or entity otherwise subject to their control or
NY
CoN
which controls them, or with which they are under common control.
LEWIS
nv
BRISBOIS
BISGAARD 93853045. 1 2
& SMITH LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION OF PLAINTIFF HUGO PINEDA
= “DEFENDANT PHILLIPS & JORDAN” shall refer to PHILLIPS & JORDAN INC. and
(i) all their present and former agents, representatives, accountants, investigators, consultants, and
NO
attorneys; (ii) any other person or entities acting on their behalf or on whose behalf they acted; or
OO
(iii) any other person or entity otherwise subject to their control or which controls them, or with
>
which they are under common control.
aA
“DEFENDANTS?” shall refer to ASOMEO ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION
BAB
INDUSTRY, LLC and PHILLIPS & JORDAN INC. and (i) all their present and former agents,
KI
representatives, accountants, investigators, consultants, and attorneys; (ii) any other person or
fF
entities acting on their behalf or on whose behalf they acted; or (iii) any other person or entity
eo
otherwise subject to their control or which controls them, or with which they are under common
met
CO
control.
ek
=
“DOCUMENTS?” include, but are not limited to, any writing as defined in California
NKR
Evidence Code section 250, including the originals, or copies when originals are not available, of
HO
any writing filed for reporting or other purposes with any federal, state, or local agesiey: notes;
F&F
ome
memoranda; letters; financial ledgers; intra-office or interoffice communications; circulars;
un
om
bulletins; manuals; results of investigations; progress reports; performance evaluations;
NHRADA
employment, transfer, or promotion applications; studies made by or for any business or personal
use; working papers; contracts; agreements; affidavits; declarations; statements; bills; books of
DB
eS
accounts; vouchers; evaluations; drawings; photographs; desk calendars; bank checks; pay stubs;
©
charge slips; receipts; expense accounts; statistical records; cost sheets; journals; diaries; personal
FS
NR
notes; time sheets or logs; computer data (whether in written, magnetic, electronic, physical, or
=
other form); computer disks; audio or video recordings; job or transaction files; medical records;
NY
N
permits, licenses, or applications therefor; unemployment applications; personnel evaluations;
&»
NY
resumes; appointment books; books; records, copies, extracts, and summaries of other documents;
ks»
NY
and preliminary, intermediate, and final drafts of any of the above, whether used or not.
NY
na
“COMMUNICATE” or “COMMUNICATION” refers to every manner or means of
NY
disclosure, transfer, exchange of information, whether orally or in writing, whether face-to-face,
NY
SoA
by telephone, mail, fax, email, or any other method.
LEWIS
rn
BRISBOIS
BISGAARD 93853045.1 3
& SMITH LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW. NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION OF PLAINTIFF HUGO PINEDA
= “RELATED TO” or “SUPPORTING” means and includes evidencing, referring,
relating, memorializing, embodying, containing, constituting, identifying, stating, being relevant
NO
to, concerning, refuting, proving, disproving, or negating.
WD
“PERSON” means any individual, firm, partnership, corporation, proprietorship,
>
association, governmental body, or other organization or entity.
mn
“COMPLAINT” means Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint filed in the Superior
Dn
Court of the State of California, County of Sacramento Case No. 34-2019-00262942-CU-OE-
KY
GDS.
fF
“STATEMENT” means any oral, written, stenographic, or recorded declaration of any
eo
kind or description.
SC
“EMPLOYMENT” or “EMPLOYED” means a relationship in which a PERSON
—_—
=
provides services requested by or on behalf of an EMPLOYER.
Ne
—_=_—
“EMPLOYER?” means a PERSON who employs PERSON to provide services in an
—|—=
}
employment relationship.
F&F
=F
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 1:
aA
=F
Any and all DOCUMENTS DEFENDANT AERI provided to YOU during YOUR
FF
BNANHeA
EMPLOYMENT with DEFENDANT AERI.
F§
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 2:
F
Any and all DOCUMENTS, including, but not limited to, calendars, day-planners, diaries,
CBO
F&
notes, journals, logs, chronologies, or memoranda prepared, written, or maintained by YOU at any
F&F
NKR
time up through the present RELATED to any aspect of YOUR EMPLOYMENT with
=|=&
NKR
DEFENDANT AERI.
N
NY
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 3:
Oo
NY
Any and all DOCUMENTS RELATED TO YOUR receipt of wages, salaries, earnings,
NR
>
bonuses, commissions, unemployment insurance benefits, disability insurance payments,
aA
NR
retirement benefits or any other financial benefits, compensation, or income YOU received from
Dn
NY
rAIo
DEFENDANTS.
rY
///
So
LEWIS
nv
BRISBOIS
BISGAARD 93853045.1 4
& SMITH LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION OF PLAINTIFF HUGO PINEDA
— REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 4:
Any and all DOCUMENTS RELATED TO the terms and conditions of YOUR
NO
EMPLOYMENT with DEFENDANT AERI.
O&O
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 5:
>
Any and all DOCUMENTS RELATED TO evaluations of YOUR job performance,
a
whether formal or informal, while YOU were EMPLOYED by DEFENDANT AERI.
BAB
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 6:
AKA
Any and all DOCUMENTS RELATED TO any written warnings OR disciplinary action
fF
RELATED TO YOUR job performance while EMPLOYED by DEFENDANT AERI.
So
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 7:
lt
CO
Any and all DOCUMENTS RELATED TO or establishing YOUR economic loss, if any as
el
—&
RELATED TO the allegations in the COMPLAINT.
NYO
me
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 8:
He
Any and all DOCUMENTS RELATED TO any attempt by YOU to mitigate the damages
F&F
mmm
alleged by YOU in the COMPLAINT.
oO
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 9:
Bo
Any and all DOCUMENTS sent by YOU to any non-parties that RELATE TO any of the
BNI
mmm
allegations in the COMPLAINT.
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 10:
CO
Any and all DOCUMENTS received by YOU from any non-parties that RELATE TO any
FS
HN
No
of the allegations in the COMPLAINT.
=
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 11:
NK
N
Any and all DOCUMENTS sent by YOU to any current employees of DEFENDANTS,
}}
N
which RELATE TO any of the allegations in the COMPLAINT.
FF
N
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 12:
NY
a
Any and all DOCUMENTS received by YOU from any current employees of
Dn
NY
DEFENDANTS, which RELATE TO any of the allegations in the COMPLAINT.
Ne
AI
///
So
LEWIS
YN
BRISBOIS
BISGAARD 93853045.1 5
& SMITH LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION OF PLAINTIFF HUGO PINEDA
= REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 13:
Any and all DOCUMENTS sent by YOU to any former employees of DEFENDANTS that
NN
RELATE TO any of the allegations in the COMPLAINT.
—
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 14:
eye
Any and all DOCUMENTS received by YOU from any former employees of
Oh
DEFENDANTS, which RELATE TO any of the allegations in the COMPLAINT.
NBD
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 15:
Any and all witness STATEMENTS RELATED TO any contention in the COMPLAINT.
fF
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 16:
SoS
Any and all signed affidavits RELATED TO any contention in the COMPLAINT.
mt
CO
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 17:
pk
=
Any and all DOCUMENTS RELATED TO any COMMUNICATION between YOU and
mk
NY
any doctors, psychiatrists, psychologists, or counselors, caused or aggravated by DEFENDANTS’
HO
mk
conduct.
F&F
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 18:
un
om
Any and all DOCUMENTS RELATED TO any Division of Labor Standards Enforcement
Bo
om
complaints or claims filed or made by YOU.
NIH
mm
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 19:
Be
Any and all DOCUMENTS RELATED TO any Labor and Workforce Development
6
Agency complaints, or claims filed or made by YOU.
CFS
CRN
NO
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 20:
=-=&
Any and all DOCUMENTS RELATED TO any Workers’ Compensation complaints or
Ne
N
claims filed or made by YOU within the last five years.
WO
N
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 21:
FF
NY
Any and all DOCUMENTS RELATED TO any Equal Employment Opportunity
un
NY
ADA
Commission complaints or claims filed or made by YOU.
NY
CSCSrAaIo
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 22:
NY
Any and all DOCUMENTS which RELATE TO any legal action in which YOU were a
LEWIS
Nv
BRISBOIS
BISGAARD 93853045.1 6
& SMITH LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION OF PLAINTIFF HUGO PINEDA
— party within the last five years.
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 23:
NO
Any and all DOCUMENTS RELATED TO YOUR EMPLOYMENT with DEFENDANT
OO
PHILLIPS & JORDAN, including any and all employment agreements, contracts, employee
>
handbooks, policies, procedures, memoranda, and correspondences.
ana
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 24:
DB
Any and all DOCUMENTS RELATED TO YOUR second cause of action that
KI
DEFENDANTS failed to pay overtime wages.
fF
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 25:
So
Any and all DOCUMENTS RELATED TO YOUR third cause of action that
CS
lt
DEFENDANTS failed to pay minimum wages.
—
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 26:
ee
NY
mem
Any and all DOCUMENTS RELATED TO YOUR fourth cause of action that
HB
DEFENDANTS failed to provide meal periods or premium pay in lieu thereof.
F&F
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 27:
Wo
Any and all DOCUMENTS RELATED TO YOUR fifth cause of action that
AB
DEFENDANTS failed to provide rest periods or premium pay in lieu thereof.
NH
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 28:
DB
Any and all DOCUMENTS RELATED TO YOUR sixth cause of action that
CO
DEFENDANTS failed to pay final wages.
FS
—R
NO
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 29:
=
Any and all DOCUMENTS RELATED TO YOUR seventh cause of action that
NY
N
DEFENDANTS failed to furnish accurate wage statements.
HH
N
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 30:
FF
NY
Any and all DOCUMENTS RELATED TO YOUR eighth cause of action that
an
NY
DEFENDANTS failed to pay reimbursement expenses.
DB
NY
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 31:
AI
NY
Any and all DOCUMENTS RELATED TO YOUR ninth cause of action for violation of
LEWIS
So
ny
BRISBOIS
BISGAARD 93853045.1 7
& SMITH LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION OF PLAINTIFF HUGO PINEDA
= Labor Code Section 558.
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 32:
NO
Any and all DOCUMENTS RELATED TO YOUR tenth cause of action that
OW
DEFENDANTS failed to keep accurate time records.
>
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 33:
DoD
Any and all DOCUMENTS RELATED TO YOUR eleventh cause of action for
solicitation of employees by misrepresentation.
HY
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 34:
Pe
All DOCUMENTS RELATED TO any monetary damages YOU allege YOU sustained as
eo
a result of DEFENDANTS’ alleged actions.
S&S
=
=
DATED: April 25, 2023 LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP
=F
NO
bu bs
OO
FEF
F&F
FF
By:
FF
vn
SHANE SINGH
Attorneys for Defendant, ASOMEO
FF
DBNHRDA
ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION
INDUSTRY, LLC
FF
F-
F-*§
©
Fo
NY
=
KL
NY
KN
»}
NKR
FF»
NY
NY
a
nAvAa
NY
Sno
NY
LEWIS
nv
BRISBOIS
BISGAARD 93853045.1 8
& SMITH LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION OF PLAINTIFF HUGO PINEDA
EXHIBIT B
6/10/23, 9:24 PM RE: Robinson v. AERI (Pineda depo on 5/13/23) - Mehta, Grace - Outlook
RE: Robinson v. AERI (Pineda depo on 5/13/23)
Singh, Shane
Thu 6/8/2023 4:00 PM
To:Patricia Savage ;French, Anne ;Max Lennig
;Morgan Forsey ;Amanda Beckwith
Cc:Mehta, Grace ;Promnick-Pavlov, Genna
Patricia —
This will confirm that we will postpone Pineda’s depo set for 5/13/23,
Please advise if you will be filing a dismissal for Pineda or motion to withdraw, please advise by COB on 5/13/23,
or we will bring a MTC to compel your client’s deposition.
| need to ask him about “accord & satisfaction”.
Thank you,
Shane
Shane Singh
Partner
Sacramento
916.646.8217 or x9168217
From: Patricia Savage
Sent: Monday, June 5, 2023 3:20 PM
To: French, Anne ; Max Lennig ; Morgan Forsey
; Amanda Beckwith
Cc: Singh, Shane ; Mehta, Grace
Subject: [EXT] RE: Robinson v. AERI
Please do note, that but for one exception, we have not spoken with Mr. Pineda since he was contacted directly
by AERI’s agent, Jonathan Fannuci, to have him sign a settlement agreement of all claims.
We understand that he is working for AERI and as there is now a conflict, we cannot produce him for the
deposition that | understand you set for tomorrow.
Thanks.
From: French, Anne
Sent: Monday, May 8, 2023 12:20 PM
To: Patricia Savage ; Max Lennig ; Morgan Forsey
; Amanda Beckwith
Cc: Singh, Shane ; Mehta, Grace
Subject: Robinson v. AERI
about:blank 1/2
6/10/23, 9:24 PM RE: Robinson v. AERI (Pineda depo on 5/13/23) - Mehta, Grace - Outlook
Counsel,
Attached please find a copy of the First Amended Deposition Notice of Plaintiff Robinson
in the above matter.
Thank you.
Anne M. French
L EWI S Legal Assistant to Shane Singh,
r Matthew Randle, George Theofanis
BRISBOIS and Grace Mehta
= Anne.French@lewisbrisbois.com
T: 916.564.5400 F: 916.564.5444
2020 West El Camino Ave., Suite 700 | Sacramento, CA, 95833 | LewisBrisbois.com
about:blank 2/2
EXHIBIT C
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO
JAY ROBINSON and HUGO PINDA, ) CERTIFIED
individually and on behalf of )
all others similarly situated,) Ue 1d Lael
Plaintiff,
Vv. CASE NO. 34-2019-0026942
ASOMEO ENVIRONMENTAL
RESTORATION INDUSTRY, LLC, a
California Corporation and
PHILLIPS & JORDAN, INC., a
North Carolina Corporation,
and DOES 1-10, inclusive,
Defendant.
VIDEOCONFERENCED DEPOSITION OF LAWRENCE KAHN
Thursday, April 21, 2022
--0o00--
Reported by: CHRISTINA BICOCCA, CSR #12932
CAROL NYGARD
& ASSOCIATES TR RCE AYA
, MeGeA DEPOSITION
DEPOSITION REPORTERS REPORTERS |
www.NygardReporting.com @ 1-877-438-7787 “#07 core Naud & Associates Deposition Reporters
= : i
CHICO | SACRAMENTO | SAN FRANCISCO | WALNUT CREEK | YUBA CITY
04/21/2022 KAHN LAWRENCE
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO
JAY ROBINSON and HUGO PINDA, )
individually and on behalf of )
CERTIFIED
all others similarly situated,) a etal
Plaintiff,
es
es
Vv. CASE NO. 34-2019-0026942
we
ete
ASOMEO ENVIRONMENTAL
RESTORATION INDUSTRY, LLC, a
ee
California Corporation and
PHILLIPS & JORDAN, INC., a
eee
North Carolina Corporation,
and DOES 1-10, inclusive,
eee
Defendant.
ee
VIDEOCONFERENCED DEPOSITION OF LAWRENCE KAHN
Thursday, April 21, 2022
--000--
Reported by: CHRISTINA BICOCCA, CSR #12932
Carol Nygard & Associates, Inc. 1-877-438-7787
04/21/2022 KAHN LAWRENCE Page2
APPEARANCES
Counsel for the Plaintiff:
SAVAGE, LAMB, REIMER & HOOPER
1550 Humboldt Road, Suite 4
Chico, California 95928
(530) 809-1851
BY: PATRICIA A. SAVAGE, ESQ.
psavage@slrhlaw.com
(PRESENT VIA VIDEOCONFERENCE)
10
Li
12 Counsel for the Defendant:
L3 LEWIS, BRISBOIS, BISGAARD & SMITH, LLP
14 2020 West El Camino Avenue, Suite 700
15 Sacramento, California 95833
16 (916) 564-5400
17 BY: SHALEND S. SINGH, ESQ.
18 shane. singh@lewisbrisbois.com
19 (PRESENT VIA VIDEOCONFERENCE)
20
21 Also Present:
22 GRACE MEHTA
23 (PRESENT VIA VIDEOCONFERENCE)
24
25
Carol Nygard & Associates, Inc. 1-877-438-7787
04/21/2022 KAHN LAWRENCE Page 122
CERTIFICATE OF CERTIFIED SHORTHAND REPORTER
I, Christina Bicocca,