On March 27, 2019 a
Stipulation,Agreement
was filed
involving a dispute between
Perez Yvette Darlene,
and
Cabrera Malena,
Inland Empire Health Plan,
Magana Yesenia,
Marin Chris,
Mass Jane,
Ramirez Tiana,
Riverside County Administrative Center Board Chambers,
San Bernardino County Government Center Board Chambers,
Sanchez Nataly,
Schmitt Andrea,
Soria Lucinda,
for civil
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
FILED
Superior Court of California
County of Los Angeles
MUSICK, PEELER & GARRETT LLP MAY 2.0 2019
624 South Grand Avenue, Suite 2000
Los Angeles, California 90017-3383
Sherri R. Caver, Executive Officer/Clerk
. y be
* ic Salado
Telephone (213) 629-7600 , Deputy
Facsimile (213) 624-1376
Stuart W. Rudnick (State Bar No. 073908) [Exempt From Filing Fee
s.rudnick@musickpeeler.com Government Code §6103]
Barbora Pulmanova (State Bar No. 234028)
b. pulmanova@musickpeeler.com
Attorneys for Defendants Inland Empire Health Plan, Jane Mass, Marlena Cabrera, Lucinda Soria,
Yesenia Magana, Nataly Sanchez, Chris Martin, Andrea, Schmitt, Tiana Ramirez
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
9
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CENTRAL DISTRICT
10
11
YVETTE DARLENE PEREZ, CASE No. 19STCV10629
12
Plaintiff, STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
13 ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR
vs. DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO
14 PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT
INLAND EMPIRE HEALTH PLAN,
15 RIVERSIDE COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE Assigned for All Purposes to:
CENTER BOARD CHAMBERS, SAN Hon. Robert S. Draper, Dept. 78
16 BERNARDINO COUNTY GOVERNMENT
CENTER BOARD CHAMBERS, JANE Action Filed: March 27, 2019
17 MASS, MARLENA CABRERA, LUCINDA Trial Date: None set
SORIA, YESENIA MAGANA, NATALY
18 SANCHEZ, CHRIS MARTIN, ANDREA,
SCHMITT, TIANA RAMIREZ and DOES 1
19 to 100, inclusive,
20 Defendants.
21
22 Pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1054(b), Plaintiff Yvette Darlene
23 Perez (“Plaintiff”) on the one hand, and Defendants Inland Empire Health Plan, Jane Mass,
24 Marlena Cabrera, Lucinda Soria, Yesenia Magana, Nataly Sanchez, Chris Martin, Andrea,
25 Schmitt, and Tiana Ramirez (“Defendants”), on the other hand, hereby stipulate as follows:
26 ///
27 Hf
28 Hf
MUSICK, PEELER 11586731 1
& GARRETT LLP
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO
PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT
Preview
FILED Superior Court of California County of Los Angeles MUSICK, PEELER & GARRETT LLP MAY 2.0 2019 624 South Grand Avenue, Suite 2000 Los Angeles, California 90017-3383 Sherri R. Caver, Executive Officer/Clerk . y be * ic Salado Telephone (213) 629-7600 , Deputy Facsimile (213) 624-1376 Stuart W. Rudnick (State Bar No. 073908) [Exempt From Filing Fee s.rudnick@musickpeeler.com Government Code §6103] Barbora Pulmanova (State Bar No. 234028) b. pulmanova@musickpeeler.com Attorneys for Defendants Inland Empire Health Plan, Jane Mass, Marlena Cabrera, Lucinda Soria, Yesenia Magana, Nataly Sanchez, Chris Martin, Andrea, Schmitt, Tiana Ramirez SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 9 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CENTRAL DISTRICT 10 11 YVETTE DARLENE PEREZ, CASE No. 19STCV10629 12 Plaintiff, STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 13 ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR vs. DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO 14 PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT INLAND EMPIRE HEALTH PLAN, 15 RIVERSIDE COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE Assigned for All Purposes to: CENTER BOARD CHAMBERS, SAN Hon. Robert S. Draper, Dept. 78 16 BERNARDINO COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER BOARD CHAMBERS, JANE Action Filed: March 27, 2019 17 MASS, MARLENA CABRERA, LUCINDA Trial Date: None set SORIA, YESENIA MAGANA, NATALY 18 SANCHEZ, CHRIS MARTIN, ANDREA, SCHMITT, TIANA RAMIREZ and DOES 1 19 to 100, inclusive, 20 Defendants. 21 22 Pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1054(b), Plaintiff Yvette Darlene 23 Perez (“Plaintiff”) on the one hand, and Defendants Inland Empire Health Plan, Jane Mass, 24 Marlena Cabrera, Lucinda Soria, Yesenia Magana, Nataly Sanchez, Chris Martin, Andrea, 25 Schmitt, and Tiana Ramirez (“Defendants”), on the other hand, hereby stipulate as follows: 26 /// 27 Hf 28 Hf MUSICK, PEELER 11586731 1 & GARRETT LLP STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT