arrow left
arrow right
  • YVETTE DARLENE PEREZ VS INLAND EMPIRE HEALTH PLAN, ET AL. Wrongful Termination (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • YVETTE DARLENE PEREZ VS INLAND EMPIRE HEALTH PLAN, ET AL. Wrongful Termination (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 08/23/2019 05:17 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by M. Panganiban,Deputy Clerk CM-110 ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY Carney R. Shegerian, Esq. (SBN 150461) Shegerian & Associates, Inc. 225 Santa Monica Boulevard Suite 700 Santa Monica, California 90401 TELEPHONE NO.: (310)860-0770 FAX NO. (Optional): (310)860-0771 E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional): CShegerian@shegerianlaw.com ATTORNEY FOR (Name): Plaintiff, Yvette Darlene Perez SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF Los Angeles STREET ADDRESS: 111 North Hill Street MAILING ADDRESS: 111 North Hill Street CITY AND ZIP CODE: Los Angeles, 90012 BRANCH NAME: Stanley Mosk Courthouse PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Yvette Darlene Perez DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Inland Empire Health Plan, et. al. CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NUMBER: (Check one): UNLIMITED CASE LIMITED CASE (Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25,000 19STCV10629; Dept. 78 exceeds $25,000) or less) A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows: Date: October 22, 2019 Time: 8:30 a.m. Dept.: 78 Div.: Room: Address of court (if different from the address above): Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name): INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided. 1. Party or parties (answer one): a. This statement is submitted by party (name): Plaintiff, Yvette Darlene Perez b. This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names): 2. Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. The complaint was filed on (date): March 27, 2019 b. The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date): 3. Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. All parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed. b. The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint (1) have not been served (specify names and explain why not): (2) have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names): (3) have had a default entered against them (specify names): c. The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which they may be served): 4. Description of case a. Type of case in complaint cross-complaint (Describe, including causes of action): See Attachment 1. Page 1 of 5 Form Adopted for Mandatory Use Judicial Council of California CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Cal. Rules of Court, rules 3.720–3.730 CM-110 [Rev. July 1, 2011] www.courts.ca.gov